<p>Anyone care to explain how princeton review's thick book 'america's best colleges' or whatever its called gave UCLA a 75 and riverside an 83? whats goin on here?</p>
<p>Wow, that's pretty weird.</p>
<p>The editor's kid got rejected from UCLA....jk lol.</p>
<p>i remember reading that book last year and it gave UCR and UCSC a higher rating.......hah thats why i dont really trust it :rolleyes:</p>
<p>well berkeley is still better than UCLA so it really doesn't matter</p>
<p>I knew I should have applied to UCR instead of UCLA... :rolleyes:</p>
<p>haha yes. me too, i knew i should've applied to riverside and totally traded ucla for it. =).</p>
<p>who gives a s*** about what princeton thinks</p>
<p>Just look at the USNWR rankings.. they're generally pretty consistent and reliable, and that's why they're the most popular rankers.</p>
<p>(Seriously, who gives a crap what princeton review thinks!)</p>
<p>ps. Anyone find it tacky how UCLA sent in with their admissions packet a review by some no-name publisher that ranked UCLA at number 2? Kind of funny how the whole article wasn't even really about that.. it was more about why princeton was number 44.</p>
<p>
[quote]
well berkeley is still better than UCLA so it really doesn't matter
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Oh boy! A troll! And this time, he's a Berkeley troll! Hooray!</p>
<p>
[quote]
ps. Anyone find it tacky how UCLA sent in with their admissions packet a review by some no-name publisher that ranked UCLA at number 2? Kind of funny how the whole article wasn't even really about that.. it was more about why princeton was number 44.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Trust me, it doesn't end there. My grad school packets even had crap like that.</p>
<p>lol yeah it was kinda corny</p>
<p>can anyone tell me what it said exactly? im curious (im an 09er)</p>
<p>its some washington newspaper article about how mit, ucla, cal in that order have most contributions to the nation/gov</p>
<p>Here's a link to the rankings, if anyone hasn't seen it yet:
<a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2005/0509.collegeguide.html%5B/url%5D">http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2005/0509.collegeguide.html</a></p>
<p>UCLAri... why am i a troll?</p>
<p>ps. Anyone find it tacky how UCLA sent in with their admissions packet a review by some no-name publisher that ranked UCLA at number 2? Kind of funny how the whole article wasn't even really about that.. it was more about why princeton was number 44.</p>
<p>hmmmm vagrantstar i never even noticed that in the admissions packet. well i guess that's because i never cared to open it.</p>
<p>well i had to see it when i was emptying the folder so i can use it</p>
<p>why is someone a troll for saying the truth? Berkeley is and always will be better than LA....you guys just have to life with the facts...USNEWS, Princeton Review (sorry sore bruins), THES etc</p>
<p>exactly mosharma... i'm not trying to insult or offend anybody. it's just the truth</p>
<p>
[quote]
ps. Anyone find it tacky how UCLA sent in with their admissions packet a review by some no-name publisher that ranked UCLA at number 2? Kind of funny how the whole article wasn't even really about that.. it was more about why princeton was number 44.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>lol.. yeah! it was so random... :rolleyes:</p>