<p>I'm dishing 700-730. Are Princeton Review practice review practice exams a practical representation of what a real test is like? The only prep I took for this exam so far was CR from SAT I which is extremely similar. </p>
<p>Also for vocab (literary terms) is knowing the Princeton review terms enough. I'm taking this exam Saturday, so any advice would be appreciated.</p>
<p>^ You're scoring in a good range. I scored in that range and got an 800 on the real thing.</p>
<p>I got 620~690 on the PR tests, 660~730 on the Barron's (weird I know, since Barron's is supposed to be harder), and 740 on the actual thing. </p>
<p>As for lit terms, I wouldn't worry about them too much. Should you know them? Yes. But to be honest, I don't remember that many questions that asked to identify the lit term used. Most of the questions were based on interpretation (or CB's anyway).</p>
<p>How does the Lit test compare in difficulty to the SAT 1 CR?</p>
<p>Lit focuses a lot more on the technical side of things and "interpretive" (but with method to it...it's not just haphazard interpretation), but CR's more about critical thinking/analysis/deduction of truths.</p>