<p>I was doing my research on the internet and I haven't found many posts about which one is better. I know that many people will say that you can use a book, but I am sadly not one of those people who would be successful in doing that. So if anyone could give me a description on what goes on in the prep class as well as their own opinion about which one is better, I would be grateful. Thank you</p>
<p>Where are you located, TheSearcher?</p>
<p>I worked for K, and unfortunately, I do not advocate their services. I have had friends who worked for PR who do not support their curriculum either. You’re basically paying a bunch of money for a college student to read a script to you. I would recommend you search for a smaller test prep program that offers tutoring using official practice material.</p>
<p>Depending on where you live, I can give you some suggestions on which program would be best for you.</p>
<p>I would not recommend Kaplan. They teach at an average level and you learn all the basic concepts. I would only recommend it if you have no idea what the SAT is and you have some extra time and money.</p>
<p>I can’t say anything about Princeton.</p>
<p>I took Kaplan and I really didn’t like it. I feel like they just kept throwing “strategies” at me without helping me improve. My score when I started Kaplan was 1440 (horrible), and when I finished the course it was 1680. I can say that they teach you basic principles that help, but that’s about it. Dont expect to go from like a 1400 to a 2000 by taking the course, although you might. </p>
<p>A lot of my friends have taken PR and their SATs and have scored in the 2k+.</p>
<p>I think in order to improve your score you have to just keep taking practice tests and going over your mistakes. I just hit the 2000-2120 mark on my last practice, which came from after about 5 tests on my own (PR and BB).</p>
<p>From where do i get this PR course ?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Because they are equally ineffective and represent a poor use of money and effort.</p>