<p>i got 780 on PR's SAT II Chemistry Practice Exam #2</p>
<p>and i got 770 on PR's SAT II Math iic Practice Exam #1</p>
<p>do you think i can get similar scores on real SAT IIs in June??</p>
<p>or are the PR SAT II Practice Exams way easier than real SAT IIs...?</p>
<p>just curious...</p>
<p>** b u m p **</p>
<p>PR was WAYYY to easy. I got 800s on all 3 practice tests and got a 700 on the real thing.</p>
<p>i think pr is pretty close to the real math iic test but maybe easier than the real chem exam. if u want decent practice for chemisry i suggest some old ap chem mc tests. i have seen similar questions on old ap chem exams on the chem sat ii i took in june of last yr. and barrons for chem is pretty close too.</p>
<p>barron's is no where close to SAT II chem. It's a lot harder. I scored average of 720 on Barron's, but got an 800 on the May test. Study the barron's prep book, but take the PR tests. Those are better predictors of your score.</p>
<p>Oh yeah, for mine I meant the chemistry test.</p>
<p>I took the barrons tests and got roughly 720, 750, 750, 800. Some of the questions seem wayyyy too easy like whats the molar mass of CaCO3, and asking for the specific oxidation numbers in compounds, like the ox no. of Ca in CaSO4? Also a lot of the questions are repeated.</p>
<p>Is the SATII chem different from barron's, or easier? Because there is lots of stuff i dont know well but its not really covered in the barron's tests. I am aiming for a 750+.</p>
<p>That's so weird. Everyone says PR is too easy for chem. My highest score on any of their practice tests was 740. Went into the real SAT II in May and took it feeling fairly unconfident and got a 780.</p>
<p>i thought PR was easy too I got 750 on one of the practice exams but only 670 and 680 on sparknotes. I was aiming for 750+ but now I'm not too sure about that anymore. Oh well, there's still a wekk to go.</p>