Princeton vs. UC Berkeley

<p>I don’t really know what you’re talking about–where is UCSD ahead of most of those schools? Are you talking about on the whole or in CS? If the former, remember that rankings of individual programs don’t say anything about the university as a whole.</p>

<p>One thing to keep in mind is that none of the rankings are set. The NRC intentionally chose to state them as ranges, within an interval of high confidence. This recognizes the fluidity of rankings, when you weight different factors, ask different people, etc.</p>

<p>Also, incredulity over a school’s placement is not a valid reason for discrediting the ranking. If the ranking were completely weird (random schools placed high, great schools placed low), it’d be cause for suspicion. But it’s well-known that UCSD has built itself up quite a lot in the past few years, mainly in its graduate programs. That’s why surveys of academics show that many of UCSD’s programs are very highly regarded. That’s why more objective measures of quality–and what academics think are the best measures of quality, as inferred from the qualities embodied in the departments they deem “exemplary”–show that UCSD is among the best in many programs.</p>

<p>Rather than fight the data, accept that programs change. If a school does not measure up, then that’s their problem; the facts don’t lie. They need to step up and get their game on, basically. (Berkeley did worse in the S-rankings than the R-rankings in this study, which suggests that it’s riding on its reputation rather than concrete, defined quality. Not in all cases, but in many.)</p>

<p>sorry RML, but it seems that you can’t seem to interpret the NRC rankings correctly. As you can see below, Carnegie Mellon is rated much higher than UCSD</p>

<p>NRC Computer Science Rankings (s-ranking range, r-ranking range)</p>

<p>Carnegie Mellon – 3-16, 3-10
UCSD ------------ 7-35, 10-25</p>

<p>maybe you looked at the research rankings?</p>

<p>Carnegie Mellon – 7-48
UCSD ------------ 6-39</p>

<p>As a left-coast resident, I’m willing to buy into the fact that Cal has better grad programs than anybody not based in Cambridge. But for undergrad, I’d recommend P’ton for the no-brainer. But the experiences will be significantly different: large public research Uni with big-time D1 sports vs. small-medium, more undergrad-focused Uni with (so-called) D1 sports.</p>

<p>bluebayou, what do you mean by “so-called” D1 sports?</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Do you mean MIT > Berkeley > others? Where is Stanford? </p>

<p>I think for CS, it should be Stanford > Berkeley = MIT = CMU perhaps = Princeton.</p>

<p>Why do people bring up grad versus undergrad everytime in a thread about Berkeley? If USNWR ranked every school’s undergrad department, I guarantee you, the rankings would hardly look any different from the graduate rankings.</p>

<p>Who cares about CS? This thread is about chemical engineering!</p>

<p>RML was using CS as an anology to compare UCB to Princeton, since he, admittedly, knows CS a lot better than ChE.</p>

<p>this approach would not be considered unreasonable</p>

<p>

[SI.com’s</a> Top 25 Rankings of the college programs - SI.com - SO On Campus](<a href=“http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/sioncampus/07/01/2008-top-25-ncaa-rankings/index.html?DB_OEM_ID=10600&bcnn=yes]SI.com’s”>http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/sioncampus/07/01/2008-top-25-ncaa-rankings/index.html?DB_OEM_ID=10600&bcnn=yes)</p>

<p>Where are the California Golden Bears?</p>

<p>^They’re rank 19 tied with Brigham Young University.</p>

<p>^^That ranking is misleading. Princeton’s higher ranking (T-13, Cal is T-19) is based upon their 8 league titles as compared to Cal’s 1. However, a title in the Ivy League is much easier to come by than a title in the Pac-10. Looking at the number of top 30 finishes nationally, competing against teams of equal strength, Cal beats Princeton 12 to 4.</p>

<p>first lets get this question answered:</p>

<p><a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/12133820-post24.html[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/12133820-post24.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>As storied as Ivy League sports are, it’s not the Pac-10, or the SEC, or the Big Ten. Especially for the major sports, the level of play, coaching, and even the rivalries are a couple notches below the top athletic conferences.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>thsfan, so when you say “major sports” would you say Football, Basketball and Baseball?</p>

<p>or are there other “major sports” that you are talking about here?</p>

<p>Because this school year, 20010-11, Princeton beats Cal in 2 of the 3 major sports.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>lol, which 2?</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>I was defining “major sports” as football and basketball, but we can throw baseball in there as well.</p>

<p>The only possible way you could be comparing Cal and Princeton this year is by simply comparing their records, which is quite frankly, an awful way of doing it, as it neglects the all-important strength of schedule. </p>

<p>In football, Cal managed to go 5-7 despite being in the same conference as Oregon, Stanford, and USC. Princeton had a miserable 1-9 record, in Division 1-AA.</p>

<p>Basketball-wise, Princeton does have a better record than Cal, but they’ve been able to play each team in the Ivy League twice, whereas Cal has had Arizona and UCLA to play.</p>

<p>In baseball, Cal was ranked as high as 15th nationally last year, whereas Princeton finished last in the league.</p>

<p>Both are great engineering schools. I would choose Princeton based on the amazing financial aid.</p>

<p>For undergraduate engineering, the only two universities I would recommend over Princeton are MIT and Stanford. Cal is obviously AMAZING in Engineering, but Princeton is practically as good and at the undergraduate level, probably as good as Cal. However, as an overall institution, Princeton is slightly better than Cal and for this reason, I would recommend it over Cal.</p>

<p>Cal wins 2-1 in major sports of Football, Basketball and Baseball this school year. Sorry, I thought that Cal baseball was going to be discontinued this year and not next year as is planned*</p>

<p>Football
Cal wins easily</p>

<p>Basketball (RPI rankings)
Priceton wins</p>

<h1>49 - Princeton (24-6)</h1>

<h1>65 - Cal (17-14)</h1>

<p>Baseball
Cal wins
N/R - Princeton (1-2)</p>

<h1>20 - Cal (7-4)</h1>

<p>*[California</a> to cut five varsity sports, including baseball - USATODAY.com](<a href=“http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/2010-09-28-cal-cuts_N.htm]California”>http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/2010-09-28-cal-cuts_N.htm)</p>

<p>This would be the overall Sports ranking of schools</p>

<p>The Directors Cup Final 2009-10 Rankings</p>

<h1>9 – Cal</h1>

<h1>32 - Princeton</h1>

<p><a href=“http://grfx.cstv.com/photos/schools/nacda/sports/directorscup/auto_pdf/d1final.pdf[/url]”>http://grfx.cstv.com/photos/schools/nacda/sports/directorscup/auto_pdf/d1final.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p><a href=“note:%20Princeton%20is%20the%20top%20ranked%20non-athletic%20scholarship%20school”>I</a>*</p>