<p>frasifrasi, I would not want to turn this commonly shared thread into a personal conversation, but I'd like to give answers general enough, so they could benefit other people as well.</p>
<p>Opinions exchanged in the aforementioned discussion on "Xiggi's advice" thread give a very good idea what a good tutor can and should provide.
One of the observations shared there was that somebody, who has worked for the big guns in the SAT prep industry, is not necessarily an expert.</p>
<p>Charging more is also not a sign of better qualification. A higher rate can be used for self-marketing purposes: for example, to create an impression of being in demand.
In my area fees vary from $35 to $150 per hour (my estimate). In seriously metropolitan lands rates go as high as $500 and possibly more per hour (nuts!?) with the average in a range of $100 - $ 200 per hour.
Does that guarantee a high quality of tutoring, you think?</p>
<p>I work as a contractor for the prep company (not humongous). Being a contractor means I can tutor students I acquire independently from this company. For a number of reasons I almost never do that.
I am sorry, but I can't share our rates - it's a proprietary information.</p>
<p>The fact that somebody is a student at a high caliber school, and/or scored perfect on SAT, does not mean s/he can prepare efficiently for the SAT.
I have to grudgingly confess that I have very rarely achieved max scores - I don't perform well under any kind of pressure. But: about 95% of my students<br>
raise their scores significantly. I know WHAT and HOW to teach them to win the SAT game.</p>
<p>That also answers your other question.
Tutoring for SAT is not about teaching/absorbing math material - does not matter whether simple or difficult. Otherwise, math teachers would be the the most thought after. Xiggi and others explained it in great detail. Being good in "math solving" is, on the other hand, enables a tutor to teach the most efficient (my favorite word) solving techniques. They are as important as SAT specific strategies that Xiggi and other posters demonstrated in numerous examples.</p>
<p>I think using a tutor to refresh basic math or grammar concepts is a complete waste of money. Same is true about working with a tutor on questions you are capable of doing on your own. "Xiggi advice" is an excellent source on ways to prepare independently. Dealing with a problem of running out of time is also covered there, I believe.</p>
<p>If I remember it right, Godot has a successful 2-month prep course.
IMO cramming tutoring into one month helps little in most cases. Exception: polishing up high 700's.</p>
<p>It's already quite a busy season, and I won't be able to be as active on this forum as I have been for the past two months. Please don't feel ignored if I don't answer questions in the future. </p>
<p>Time for a common mantra: "I hope this helps".</p>