<ol>
<li>I noticed that one of the professors in my department makes more than professors who have been working for 20+ years. Why is that? This professor is only an “associate” professor. While the people who have been working 20+ years are full blown professors.</li>
</ol>
<p>A: Salaries depend strongly on the quality of research and the professional reputation of the faculty member (which is 90% based on research). The best universities compete for talent in a national market. They’re looking for publications, reputation, and research grant history. Salaries within ranks, especially at Associate and full Professor, can be highly “unequal” because performance levels differ. Years of service by itself is not that important because new entrants to a given faculty rank, or new hires in general, get market-competitive salaries, while “long time” members in a given rank may get minimal raises from year to year unless they do stellar research or have competitive outside offers from other universities.</p>
<ol>
<li>What is your pay based on? Research, teaching and service, right?</li>
</ol>
<p>A. Depends in part on the type of school. At research-oriented universities, and in research-oriented programs, your pay is based overwhelmingly on your research. In some places, the “quantity” of research (articles and books published, etc.) counts as much as the “quality” of research (publication in leading journals in your field, citations to your work by other scholars, ability to win ontinuous competitive grant funding, awards and prizes). But mainly it’s quality that matters, or perhaps high quantity of high quality research.</p>
<p>Teaching matters next, but its weight in salary determination varies a lot from department to department and college to college. Generally speaking small colleges (LAC’s) pay lower salaries than large universities but also link salary raises more to teaching performance than do large universities. But in almost any decent college you don’t get promoted (or tenure) or survive just based on good teaching unless you are a star in the classroom.</p>
<p>Service? Rarely is a critical factor in salaries. Also, you can’t get promoted based on service alone anywhere I know of, unless you somehow slip into the administrative class, so to speak, in mid-career (after you earn tenure) and earn your promotion to full professor that way – not based on your research or teaching.</p>
<ol>
<li>Why is the starting salary so low? 30k for ALL of that education? Seems exploitive.</li>
</ol>
<p>A. Where did you get that figure? I don’t know of any PhD starting out as an Assistant Professor full time who is making less than $60K. Anybody getting 30K is either part-time, an adjunct or visiting assistant prof, or hasn’t finished the PhD yet. $30K is closer to what a 1/2-time graduate assistant would be receiving over 12 months than what a typical faculty member earns.</p>
<p>Also, average salary levels differ greatly according to what field you’re in. Generally speaking, salaries in the humanities are lowest, social sciences are higher, then sciences, then the professional schools. But there are huge differences across the different discipliines (as well as across individuals). For example in social sciences, economists make very high salaries while anthropologists make fairly low salaries – but this is just referring to the “average,” not what the academic stars might make in a given field.</p>
<ol>
<li>Is there any good reading mateiral out there that discusses salaries/tenure?</li>
</ol>
<p>Not that I know of. I’ll pass on this one. Hope the above information is helpful.</p>