PSAT '09 Form W Thread

Test Preparation SAT Preparation
441

<p>Erm. Its the absolute value of (a-b) and the smallest value.</p>

442

<p>can someone tell me if i might get commeneded…</p>

<p>math = -2
CR = -8-12…vocab ugh…enough said
W = -3 to 4 max…</p>

443

<p>its 1.2 trust me im 100% sure</p>

444

<p>@Galib
We don’t know the scale, so it’s hard to calculate. If you have the test practice book, there is a scale on the very last page for that booklet that you could try.</p>

<p>Commended is usually 200+</p>

445

<p>@Galib2011
i wanna say boderline…but on the safer side</p>

446

<p>"Wouldn’t Bach question have an error at (was dependent) since it should be changed to depended. "</p>

<p>I almost put that, but I thought that its phrasing was grammatically correct, therefore changing it to “depended” wouldn’t make it an error.</p>

<p>I think i said NE</p>

447

<p>hmmm
why was this one not zero as the lowest value?</p>

<p>where is 1.2 coming from?</p>

448

<p>I agree with 1.2</p>

449

<p>I also said no error because I felt that “was dependent” and “depended” were both acceptable.</p>

<p>But who knows if I’m right.</p>

450

<p>how could the one for find the value of x be 110 and not 108, if you kind of turned the test booklet side ways a little and then looked at it you get x=108, i just ignored the 142</p>

451

<p>@hosain
How did you get zero? What can you divide 12 by to get zero? I figured that to get the smallest possible value, you would want the largest divisor. So I took the largest numbers in the given domain for x and y:
5- neg5 = 10
12/10 = 1.2</p>

452

<p>i thought it was an isosceles trapezoid too.</p>

453

<p>wat is the bach question everyones talking about. its driving me crazy! o_O n isnt it 108 cuz its isosceles trapezoid?</p>

454

<p>hahaha
my b</p>

<p>i put 0 on the bottom (x and y = 0) but just realized that that would mean its undefined</p>

<p>…
clearly i’m screwed in terms of math.</p>

455

<p>it’s def 110</p>

<p>I solved it 3 times</p>

456

<p>howwww??? :(</p>

457

<p>I said it was 110.
I’m not sure what region you guys are calling the isosceles trapezoid because I can’t remember the exact figure, but I remember solving it using a parallelogram.</p>

458

<p>It was 110.</p>

459

<p>anyone remember any other questions?</p>

460

<p>oh n the one about 20 25 30… and the other one that increased by 2. will it ever catch up?</p>