<p>For the reticence & pensive question… I think I put that. I’m not sure what were the other choices?</p>
<p>@desude i think reticent and pensive is correct
any one remembers the sentence completion question about elite, latitude.</p>
<p>what about the writing question in the paragraphs with smiling, therefore… what’d you guys replace therefore with</p>
<p>Prescient for one of the first fill-in-the-blanks?</p>
<p>Did anyone get the writing question about the terra-cotta soldiers being excavated?</p>
<p>prescient was one. i also put elite and latitude. and it was by contrast instead of therefore (i think, not confident)</p>
<p>what was the classicist question</p>
<p>@seaweed, that was no error</p>
<p>I said moistened, because it talked of a brown environment in the valley(?) and then they talked of a lush green forest… the others don’t make sense.</p>
<p>Also, for the tone of the first passage, I put unequivocal because he is fairly adamant about energy independence.</p>
<p>Did people put the opportunity choice for the second part of a vocab question dealing with adversaries?</p>
<p>Was 1.5 the grid in?</p>
<p>@archery do you remember the answer choices?</p>
<p>Ok, thanks Sparchilles, I believe that was an open ended question right?</p>
<p>whats the predicted curve?</p>
<p>Terra cotta and WWII novel were no change. Respectfully not respectively. and the mars one was A.</p>
<p>^ for the opportunity, I was between that choice and compensate? I think that was one of the choices?</p>
<p>is was asking for the product of .5 and 1.5, so answer should be .75</p>
<p>dont remember prescient question, put elite and latitude, by constrast</p>
<p>I put consumed</p>
<p>Original, not classicist. Aloof, not pensive. I’m sure of both.</p>
<p>Moistened, not consumed. 95% sure.</p>
<p>@desudesudesu: WWII novel <em>was</em> respectively.</p>
<p>I knew there was something wrong with respectively.</p>
<p>Dang it, I said no error</p>