<p>i said that one too bereft/theatricality or something. and i said impecunious and affluent. I believe that ebullience for a different one also (and I think i said it.. i dont remember)</p>
<p>no thats right. ebullience goes with pessimism.
impecunious and affluent is right. </p>
<p>the morals and wrestling something like this - Professional wrestling is a lot like moral plays - there is a stark difference between good and evil, light vs. dark, making it ______ of __________. i said devoid of ambiguity because there is a stark difference.</p>
<p>I should clarify more, sorry! :(</p>
<p>Ebullience...pessimism was for a completely different sentence than impecunious and affluent.</p>
<p>^ that's what I thought, too.</p>
<p>tepid
"considerable frustration" -snorting and being exasperated over the grape-foot
the development of space jargon was unprecedented conditions
wrestling - devoid of ambiguity
same things in different cultures mean differnt things? (A) napkin/bonnets
edith wharton was a proponent
"simple line"= uncomplicated
provincial charm for the wall traveling passage
author's attitude about hollywood - derisive
"never more alone than being alone" -- paradox.
and fastidious/obsession was an answer.
toxin was an answer for fill-in
took = "glean"
impecunious and affluent was an answer</p>
<p>accumulated. pretty confident about answers. any more? please add on</p>
<p>In Traveling
- "shadows"
- both authors would agree ______ about traveling alone
- "comforts"
- author 1 would disagree with the long quotation in 2 because _____</p>
<p>did other people get devoid of ambiguity? or did anybody else get a different answer</p>
<p>oh, oh, what were the comforts again? the "eventful things"?</p>
<p>shadows was a common example soemthing nice to share or something like that.</p>
<p>both authors would agree it needs personal inclination. </p>
<p>i dont remember the last 2</p>
<p>personal inclination for what? i dont remember that Q</p>
<p>its like "with which statement would they agree about travelling alone?"</p>
<p>for the comforts I said the eventfull things I think</p>
<p>yea i put personal inclination too.</p>
<p>does anyone remember that easy one with the answer comform/rejected</p>
<p>yeah that one was conform/rejected.</p>
<p>yeah i got that
the vocab was not as difficult as i expected it to be.</p>
<p>what personal inclination thing? sorry, i really don't remember the question. was it "what would the authors criticize fleming about?" what were the other choices?</p>
<p>Does anybody remember what the main point of the space passage was? It was something like "the author would most likely agree with which of the following?" and then something about "communication b/w scientists and laypeople" and something about "unpredecented events"...</p>
<p>No, the personal inclination one was asking about what the two authors would agree on.</p>
<p>The conform/rejected thing was something like "People tend to ____ due to fear of being _____."</p>
<p>The vocab was a bit more difficult than I had anticipated, but I thought the reading passge questions were really easy.</p>
<p>There was also the one about "companionship comforts" or something, and what author one would say about it (the last question to the travel alone passage)... what did you guys get? </p>
<p>I put something like "interrupting dialogue"...</p>
<p>it was unprecedented events not laypeople (laypeople are people who don't understand the situation). I said it was a universal language or something but that is wrong.</p>