<p>well lol i know it didnt mean running…i meant like it was mentioned…whatever</p>
<p>@qwerty23 the line was 3/5X
@jollybolly yes sanguine was an answer</p>
<p>yes, sanguine was an answer. :)</p>
<p>@jollybjolly
pretty sure sanguine was a correct answer (or part of one)</p>
<p>f(x) has two roots, and g(x) was like 3/5 * f(x) or something, so there were definitely two intersections at the zeroes
Not 3/5 times f(x), it was 3/5x.</p>
<p>what were the other choices for “sanguine”?</p>
<p>@jollybjolly I was pondering on that question too. I don’t remember what I put but it was not sanguine.</p>
<p>i put that too</p>
<p>because it was an optimistic prediction</p>
<p>was 6/14 the answer for the one with the probability of a women being chosen from a group?</p>
<p>then its settled, DEFINITELY 2 intersections</p>
<p>anyone remember putting “____ … caution”?</p>
<p>sanguine? doesnt that mean bloodthirsty?
what were the alternatives for that?</p>
<p>It was definitely two intersections. If you graphed g(x)=3/5x, (which is a line btw) you can easily see that it intersects the arc as well as another point.</p>
<p>I got sanguine. Pretty sure.</p>
<p>@aayaa, chinese adults say “aaya” in the same way we would use -facepalm-.</p>
<p>Crap. I failed</p>
<p>I’m pretty sure it was running…
the sentence was “fear of _____ courses through debates” or something
so “fear of ____ EXAMINES through debates” doesn’t really make sense.</p>
<p>@neojunk it was sanguine bc it said it was optimistic</p>
<p>yea but i simplified it to 3/7
it was a grid in right?</p>
<p>I got 3/4 for the women being chosen from the group. Now that I think of it, I did it wrong XD</p>
<p>What was the sanguine question?</p>
<p>@gracee yes it was running but i don’t think it was that sentence haha</p>