PSAT Sat.

Test Preparation SAT Preparation
581

<p>violin - im not sure, but logically, everything is based off percentiles so im assuming that the difficulty affects the curve and thus the scores</p>

582

<p>what was the tone of the task: LUDICROUS OR INCOMPREHENSIBLE?
I put Not on as an error: not X but rather Y</p>

583

<p>was it could be or could have been able to be for the founders one in W?</p>

584

<p>ok then what’s wrong with this sentence, " not on purpose, but on accident".</p>

585

<p>csk90 - it was could be</p>

586

<p>well its right because you put a comma there; there was no comma in the sentence</p>

587

<p>Definitely LUDICROUS</p>

588

<p>Definitely risky^</p>

589

<p>yeah and sabree hockey, i think its not idiomatic to say not on or at least that was my reasoning.</p>

590

<p>nah brah it was ludicrous. lol</p>

<p>anyways what was the SC for accelerating? i honestly dont remember that one</p>

<p>and anyone care to elaborate on the not X but rather Y or not X but Y thing…its really confusing</p>

591

<p>“not on top but on bottom” that uses correct idiomatic expressions and does not have a common i cant see what’s wrong with this sentence and the one on the test</p>

592

<p>why was it could be? i dont get it.</p>

593

<p>hey, what’s the cutoff score for california?</p>

594

<p>Yeah I put ludicrous.</p>

<p>Also, for the sentence completion on the animals hibernating, it was severity of the harsh winter or something like that wasn’t it… I put aridity >< In retrospect, that was so freakin stupid.</p>

595

<p>well for short sentences you dont use commas. that was a long sentence. [GMAT</a> Idioms List](<a href=“http://www.platinumgmat.com/about_gmat/sc_gmat_idiom_list]GMAT”>GMAT Idioms List) list of idioms is not X but rather Y. it also has a comma but maybe that also corroborates the fact that the but on was not correct? i really am not sure</p>

596

<p>I believe it was 219 last year and 218 the previous year… to be safe, I’d go for anything higher than 220. I live in Cali also.</p>

597

<p>@ annotyingkaash - wat was the sentence again i just remember that it was could be</p>

598

<p>I went with ludicrous as well. And yes, pretty sure it was severity.</p>

599

<p>do u know what happens if u 4get 2 round ur answers, cuz i put 6/14 instead of 3/7 and i feel like jumping off a cliff
ugggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh</p>

600

<p>6/14 is fine…as long as the fraction is withint the 4 boxes it doesnt have to be simplified</p>