ahhh. PTA and PTO; part of them for years and loved it, honestly.
Our schools (for 18 yrs) were 70% low SES district, so the money really went to support the students. (scholarships, library books, field trips, supplies etc).
we once had a ticket raffle shut down and prohibited as it was considered illegal gambling by the state!
as PTA volunteers we tutored, volunteered in classrooms, did traffic duty, chaperoned field trips, class parties, sponsored food drives for even less privileged schools - you know! you’ve done it! Our efforts were for all the kids, everyone included. We did this willingly.
We had the same volunteers year after year, and very few volunteers were from the families who were bussed in to our neighborhood schools. (and yes, pta meetings and committees were at night, so accessible to all). It saddens me to see this school now (right out my window); as the neighborhood kids have grown, and the school is mostly filled with low SES students who are not from the area, and the PTA is down to crumbs, doing very little.
But - here is what rubbed me, and why i take umbrage with that article. I feel slightly defensive as had parents angry and complaining at our PTA several years when the (free) school carnival didnt have enough volunteers to cover all the booths. What? complaints about not enough volunteers when they themselves aren’t volunteering???
In this story, we dont know the parameters of the event. Was it all donated, and very limited on space and food? Fundraisers like that dinner are geared toward MAKING money. The event in that article was a fundraiser - not a school activity per se. It does sound like a pay-for-play OUT of School experience. And the writer didnt know how to play that game.
I think the writer should start her own dinner-dance if she didnt like the rules of this one. Have a pasta dinner or pancake dinner at her school, cheap, with decor and music. Every kid and family could be involved that way; it would be more for the experience rather than the fundraising aspect though.