<p>I was browsing over classes and had a couple of questions. Regarding the History 97 seminars how come they don't have the class titles up yet? They have "topics of US/european/eastern history etc" things up but not the individual class titles. Anyone know why this is, or when (if ever) they'll put up the individual class titles? Also, regarding the Honors Collegium class, do you have to be an honors student to enroll in these or are they open to anyone? Are they more difficult than "normal" classes? Thanks.</p>
<p>What's the point? You'd probably just fail them all anyway.</p>
<p>ironic coming from you ;)</p>
<p>You're one to talk. Jealousy.
[quote]
Also, regarding the Honors Collegium class, do
[/quote]
...you have a chance to do remotely well? Doubtful. Go play your lacrosse and sip your "kool-aid." I'm sure Ari would agree.</p>
<p>97s are sometimes decided pretty late. i've seen titles not come out till after second pass.</p>
<p>More difficult? More demanding in terms of workload. It doesn't take a genius to decode an "Honors" Collegium course. If anything, it is just a pretentious title to stroke the egos of pretentious people - like myself. :rolleyes:</p>
<p>yah em... right xD</p>
<p>no, you don't need to be in honors to take HC classes. they can be very rewarding in and of themselves (small class size, etc), and some of them are also GEs or fulfill WII. also, if you decide to join honors, they'll count. i'd say that since they're more specialized than other classes, and because they're smaller, you're expected to not slack off in HC classes. but i don't think that the "honors" label in itself means they are more difficult- i'm sure it varies.</p>
<p>Varies upon how brilliant you are and much of a slacker you want to be - of course, with me it's mostly the former, hardly the latter... with as much work as hater puts into building his varicose veins on his "muscular" arms. :rolleyes:</p>