<p>For the most part, I just lurk the CC boards. But after spending some time at the Berkeley board, I've become a bit worried about what I've seen. I was hoping you'd be able to clarify something.</p>
<p>-What are the problems you have with Cal? Is it just the fact that those that are less motivated or willing to take initiative have a higher chance of falling through the cracks?</p>
<p>-If so, why do you continue to tell those that are considering other schools, such as MIT, Harvard, etc., about this horrible atmosphere at Cal? Your posts have strong negative undertones, and although you do make some concessions, they will for the most part turn those people that are considering Cal with other top schools away. However, those that have been accepted to Cal as their best school will take Cal over UCSD or other comparable schools. This seems to actually result in the opposite of your intention; those with the best chance to succeed at Cal (those that have shown their skills and intelligence by getting into other great, highly selective schools) reject Cal. Those that have Cal as their top choices and probably at the highest risk of "falling through the cracks" go on to choose Cal.</p>
<p>-If my goal is to eventually double major in business and engineering, while participating in undergraduate research, where will I most likely have the best academic opportunities, assuming I am motivated enough to seek them out? Penn has the Jerome Fisher Tech/Management program, which integrates business and engineering. At Cal, there is the risk I won't get into one of the two schools. At Northwestern, the integration is to a lesser degree and an Undergraduate business degree is not available. However, as far as research, it is most available at Northwestern but the caliber, in my opinion from what I have seen, is greater at Berkeley. I do not know of the research at UPenn. If you have the time, please correct the inaccuracies of my statements and fill in the blanks.</p>
<p>-As far as atmopshere, I visted all three of the campuses in the past couple weeks and loved them all. San Francisco is an awesome city, so much to do, great food, great weather. Chicago.. how can you not like Chicago? I hear its cold. Very cold. Never been there when its cold. But at the same time, I've always lived in mild/hot weather and I wouldn't mind a chance to experience something different. (Yes, I realize both UCB and NU are in suburbs, not SF/Chicago. But the culture does carry over, and neither is eccessively far.) I don't know much about Philly, but I loved the UPenn campus and the surrounding area, or what little of it I saw. And the athletic facility is freakin' awesome. </p>
<p>-Yes, I realize the Penn waitlist is hard to get in off of. But I'm still considering it as an option just because if you get in, you basically do have to go (assuming you make the effort to go and they let you in because of your enthusiasm.) I loved the place, but I just don't know where I think i'd fit best. They're all wonderful places. (I visted it because a friend got in, we were both visiting Northwestern, and I did not want to make the effort of getting in off the WL if I hadn't seen the campus.)</p>
<p>-Sakky, please do reply to the paragraph about your intentions of steering those that may fall through the cracks away. I don't want to you drive away a potential future friend, genius, witty, motivated, etc. because of your negative posts even though they may have succeeded at Berkeley. I recognize you are an intelligent person, and I am sure you can see why I have an issue. I also recognize that you are trying to help people, but I think you need to make sure you make it clear that those that have the drive, intelligence, and will to succeed at MIT and make it far in the world could do so at Berkeley as well. Please do not take away the gifted at my potential University :)</p>
<p>-Thank you for any information any of you end up giving me, and sorry for any spelling errors or grammatical mistakes.</p>
<p>Edit..I changed the title a little</p>