<p>are you kidding Lockz? American? go to britain and checkout all of the 15 year old girls wheeling around their babies while smoking cigarettes on their way to eat some fish and chips...or all the hordes of young teenagers drinking and smoking in the streets</p>
<p>And just what is wrong with girls having sex? Girls do enjoy sex too, you know, that's what the clitoris is there for.</p>
<p>ChamilitaryMayne, I do know that. I lived in Britain for four years.</p>
<p>AUlostchick, no one is saying girls can't have sex, but they should be dignified about it. They shouldn't let just any guy enter the orfices of their body.</p>
<p>But this girl wasn't "just letting any guy enter the orifices of her body", she was just kissing them. It's not like she was having a foursome with all three of them at once right there in the middle of the party. Making out doesn't make you slutty.</p>
<p>Ummm, hello...the mouth is an orfice. Those guys were desecrating her temple! Have some dignity, girl! Where's her dignity?!</p>
<p>the mouth is an orfice haha...and it can make you slutty and definitely makes you seem slutty with 3 different guys in one night</p>
<p>If you're going to use a word, at least TRY to spell it correctly.</p>
<p>Orifice. Orifice. Orifice.</p>
<p>And yes, it's an orifice. But why is a woman's body a temple while a man's isn't? (Again, there's an interesting anthropological argument, but let's hear yours.)</p>
<p>When did chastity go out of style? Why can't people wait these days? As for men...I don't think they should be having their whoopi either. The men's temples have an entrance...y'all know what it is, but it wasn't being entered by the women...kay?</p>
<p>I wasn't being completely serious if y'all didn't pick up.</p>
<p>Lockz,</p>
<p>"Chastity" was always broken. Read old literature, and you'll find that the idealized "chaste" marriage was always a sham. Don't romanticize when you don't have to do so.</p>
<p>Ari, what is your opinion of the girl (not the guys)?</p>
<p>She was probably too inebriated to make a sound decision. Was it a mistake? Probably. Should she be condemned? No. She deserves no more or less scorn than the guys.</p>
<p>I agree with the part about the guys. I don't really care for guys taking advantage of drunk girls.</p>
<p>who is this girl? she is really popular now...if only she knew she was being talked about extensively on an online forum</p>
<p>In the end, the notion of a "chaste" woman is an unfair double standard that puts women in a no-win situation. If she doesn't have sex, because of the fear of retribution, then she's a shrew or frigid. If she has sex and enjoys it, she gets to be called even less nice things.</p>
<p>Women, like men, are sexual beings. Of course people are better of showing discretion, but holding them to standards that men are exempt from (and so far, they mostly have been) only gives women complexes.</p>
<p>Is it any wonder that women are more likely to have sexual dysfunctions than men?</p>
<p>Hear hear, Ari! As a women who enjoys sex, I'll be damned if someone calls me slutty for it. They can stick it up their back orifice for all I care. </p>
<p>That's not to say, you should go around having sex all over the place with different guys every night (or different girl every night, for guys), that's just irresponsible. If your protection fails (and you BETTER be using it if you're all over the place), how are you going to know who the daddy of your baby is then? (or for guys, how are you going to know who all your baby mommas are?) I don't have a problem with people having a high number of sexual partners as long as it's ONE AT A TIME. As in, have sex with this one person for however long (preferably in a relationship but not always), then if you decide you don't want to anymore, great. but then, don't have sex with them anymore period, if you find a new person. that new person should be the only one, now. This is the main reason why cheating bugs me so much. If you want some new ass, JUST BREAK UP ALREADY.</p>
<p>Question for y'all...How long do you think someone should be in a relationship before doing the nasty with their partner...on average?</p>
<p>Also, do y'all think teenagers (especially high schoolers) need sexual pleasure or do they just follow a hedonistic philosophy and want it?</p>
<p>I think that generalities rarely work.</p>
<p>Some relationships might function better with sex early on. Others, not so much. It's hard to paint with such a broad brush and expect to capture all the details.</p>
<p>I think that generalities rarely work.</p>
<p>Some relationships might function better with sex early on. Others, not so much. It's hard to paint with such a broad brush and expect to capture all the details.</p>
<p>If someone wants to have sexual relations frequently it really is not that a big deal to me. Hopefully they understand the potential consequences although. I can't say I admire or think highly of people have tons of random sex, but its their life.</p>
<p>My sister was just telling me about a house she was at with just 4 others. According to here 2 of the guys(mid twenties) were having a threesome with a 35ish year old woman they just picked up at a bar in the living room and spa for everyone to see. I think we can all agree all 3 of them are slutty.</p>
<p>Well, I don't think anyone NEEDS sexual pleasure, at least not from another person, but it's very high on the want-so-bad-it-feels-like-a-need list. It feels good, and it's fun, and it can be bonding for two people if you let it. Why not? I don't think there needs to be any set time limit on when you should have sex in a relationship. But, if you actually want a serious relationship, you might want to wait until you're actually in one to put out and not do it on the first or second date. At least wait until you have the actual, I want to be exclusive, talk. If you're not looking for a serious relationship, then hey, knock yourself out, just be safe about it.</p>