I wouldn’t classify Stuyvesant as a college prep school though.
First of all, it’s a public school, so funds for counselors, etc. will be a lot more limited than at a private school or charter school, ie: one college counselor for every 2 hundred+ kids, etc.
2ndly, the student really has to be proactive and independent at times, because they have to be able to navigate the system that is in their school. Ie: they only get to meet with the college counselor once in Junior year, for like ½ hour. They have to be able to speak with the teachers on their own if they have questions about their grades. They have to be able to ask for teacher recommendations when that teacher have possibly one or two hundred students that they teach, etc.
3rdly, Stuyvesant does not ‘teach’ to the level of the SATs nor pander to the SATs. I believe they teach to as high a bar as possible, and not limited to only teaching to scoring high on an exam. The teaching is not structured around attaining a high score on act/sat exams. (although you’d never know that because the parents and kids are always talking about the sats, sats, sats.)
So I would say it is definitely not a college prep school. Of course, because of the type of students there, they score pretty well on the exams anyway, and the students are very qualified to be in college by the time they graduate.
There are other private/charter/magnet schools that are college prep, I’m sure, where you’ll get college credit for the high school classes you’ve taken, and can graduate college in 3 years, or where the counselors know you well, or where placing students in an elite college is the goal of the staff, etc. but I would say Stuyvesant is not that school.
Sure, I do wish that my son had gone to a private school with all that it implies, but he had to follow his path I guess, so yes, a student can do very well, if not better, at a high school that is not branded ‘elite’ but I’m secretly proud of him that he was able to navigate the behemoth that is Stuyvesant high school.