I suspect the most common outcomes for Brown CS grads were FAANG, hedge funds/trading firms, and PhDs, likely in that order. With FAANG hires recently becoming less common, a few more may shift into the latter two, but the number they take is limited.
Note that hiring for hedge funds/trading firms was already much more selective than hiring for FAANGs. The same is true for being able to join the best PhD programs. In college admission terms, for the talented Brown CS students, FAANGs were match/safety whereas the other two were the reaches.
Itās not that you get higher pay in the same firm, but that there are higher paying jobs more readily available. My literal next door neighbor has a child that attends Brown. He will be joining a trading firm after graduation, making somewhere north of $400k his first year.
ETA: Another āreachā available for Brown CS students is starting a company and getting venture funding.
Can confirm for Harvard as well. And if you add in the students who chose their other reach fields, such as starting a company or PhDs, you are likely talking closer to 20%.
Many people here on CC will find that very hard to believe
I know an absolutely brilliant math/CS/physics grad (friendās son) from a tippy-top school that went to work for NASA making something in the low 100s. And he loves what he does.
It is actually worthy of a thread ā what do people on CC think their kids want to do, or what do kids on CC want to do post grad ā dream job. Post whatever major is of interest. My son tells me that kids who do real engineering ( as opposed to fake engineering like CS) mostly take up engineering jobs.
Heās in the minority at his particular school (which does skew IB/Wall Street). But if you look across the board, CS grads have a very wide range of interests. Iād say next to IB/WS, FAANG also gets a lot of attention on these boards but not everyone wants to go there either. That was my point.
My son was flown around to a few top HFs during his freshman year, but after his first summer internship, he decided not to continue on that path because he thought ā how should I put it ā what they were doing was too āpedestrianā (he was studying CS/AI in college). Iāve also had a pretty good seat to observe whatās going on and I donāt disagree with him.
I generally donāt mind slightly off-topic discussions myself , but in this case, I donāt think OP has indicated that her son was interested in a job in finance. Until she does, I agree with @momofboiler1 that we shouldnāt delve too much into that familiar topic again.
Be careful of hidden requirements. Some schools are able to list fewer overall requirements for their major because they donāt include the prereqs. For instance, discrete math may not be required for the major, but it may be a prereq for a class that is.
Good point. I noticed this with one obvious requirement at Brown. The first math class that is required for CE is Calculus 2, but clearly you have to take Calculus 1 before you can take calculus two.
It may be better to make the comparison in terms of semester credit hour equivalents, since some colleges may have mostly 3 credit courses that students take 5 of each semester, while other colleges may have mostly 4 credit courses that students take 4 of each semester. Some colleges may also split labs off into separate courses (e.g. physics + physics lab instead of physics with lab).
Note that many ABET accredited engineering majors in practice require more than 75 semester credit hours or equivalent in technical (math, science, engineering) courses.
Note that ABET accredited computer science has different criteria from the above.
Subarea coverage and emphasis within the major can vary at different colleges / departments. This may affect what in-major electives are available to the student.
ABET accreditation basically sets a reasonably high minimum standard, so the program is reasonable preparation for working in engineering. But different programs meeting that standard can vary in many ways (not just in signaling prestige).