<p>IMO, it's
Bio E/M, Chem, Physics
Literature
World/US History
Math Level 2
most languages
Math Level 1
Korean
Chinese</p>
<p>I'd put Lit above Bio E/M and the rest.</p>
<p>Any language test is easy for native speakers. And yeah Chinese is the easiest, because most non-natives have an extremely difficult time with it.</p>
<p>Math 1 should be above languages....</p>
<p>How the hell can someone rank all the subject tests when NO ONE has taken them all? Who the heck takes more than like five? For the record I took 3.<br>
Physics: 800 Chemistry: 800 Math II: 780, and got into an Ivy league school.</p>
<p>I've taken five, scored equally on all of them, (something starting with 8, :p), but my ranking's like this:</p>
<p>Literature
Chemistry
Bio E
Math IIC/Chemistry</p>
<p>Hey Shrivats, maybe Literature was hardest to get an 800 because you missed redundancies ;)</p>
<p>Anyway, regardless of my personal scores, of the three I took (hardest to easiest):</p>
<p>Chemistry
Spanish
Math IIc</p>
<p>In my school, it goes something like this (hardest to easiest):</p>
<p>Bio E
MathI
Physics
Chemistry
World/US History
MathII
Chinese/Korean</p>
<p>nobody takes lit in our school (they don't really need to). </p>
<p>Personally (with the few that I have taken and am going to take)</p>
<p>French
Bio E
Physics
US History
MathII
Chemistry</p>
<p>My school and I obviously don't like bio ;)</p>
<p>Well after having done the one's I have...in order of worst score to best it's</p>
<p>Math IIC
Bio E
Literature</p>
<p>with a nearly 200 point difference =P </p>
<p>I guess you can say I'm not terribly mathy....damn asian stereotypes have failed me! (maybe I shouldn't have done that and hope stereotypes makes admissions assume I'm a genius in science then think I'm well rounded.</p>
<p>I found Math IIC, Physics, and Chem rather easy, but I suppose Chem was the worst for me in the hilarious 790<800 sense. ;) (I know all the material, but tend to get a bit distracted on the T/F/CE section.)</p>
<p>The other thing about Chinese/Korean is that if you <em>actually</em> study them as a foreign language, they can be really difficult just because so many people taking those tests are native speakers and miss no questions. So, whereas you can miss four or five questions on the math SAT II and still be in the high 700s/800 range (or so I've been told), if you miss five questions on the Chinese/Korean test, you're probably in the low to mid 700s already.</p>
<p>Hey BigBenFan, you raise an interesting issue. I got into Harvard with 800 French, 800 Literature, and 800 Writing (this was years ago). It makes me wonder whether it's better for Ivy League admissions to have three perfect or near-perfect scores instead of 4-6 low-700 range scores.</p>
<p>Also, it seems to me more and more than some people take almost every exam they can get their hands on (what can you say?).</p>
<p>The four I've taken I'd rank as follows (hardest to easiest): Biology-M, Math-I, Literature, US History. I'd say, however, that all this really does depend on what you're best at subject-wise and what courses you've taken in school prior to taking the SATs.</p>
<p>According to what I'm taking (hardest to easiest):
French
Biology
MathIIC</p>
<p>hmmm...
probably</p>
<p>lit
bio
USH
chem
physics
MathII
WH
MathI</p>
<p>that's for me at least (IMO), but you can't really say since everyone is different</p>
<p>chem seems to be very difficult but then again my chem teacher was horrific. id say math II is easy if ur careful, ush is harder than world, lit is harder than anything, from what ive seen no1 but native speakers takes chinese making it so a 790 is a very low percentile. math I is an easy test but the curve isnt too generous.</p>