<p>its really not about the inclusion of Wisconsin into his list of elite publics, its more the exclusion of Texas and moreso, UNC. And as for bias, I have no regional bias because im canadian. In fact, from where im sitting, i should have a bias towards Wisconsin. Nevertheless, I have no regional bias towards UNC or Texas or against Wisconsin, I just believe that UNC is as good if not better than Wisconsin and it shouldve been included in his list. As for the "abysmal 3 spots", UNC is an "abysmal 3 spots" below UCLA...does this mean UNC is better than UCLA? Most likely not. It just means that UNC is comparable with UCLA on many levels...which i think is precisely the point you were making about Wisconsin and UNC.</p>