<p>no arnold’s slow voice when he said “aout there” helped jack imagine stuff</p>
<p>No, that was him trying to imagine where Arnold has traveled.</p>
<p>yeah i put the imagining choice too, also, did jack think the old stuff he did was childish?</p>
<p>jamesford: thats what i put.</p>
<p>and IMO, actually thought the mall passage was harder than the first passage. what did y’all put for the “northdale/southdale” question</p>
<p>For the accent, I remember it stated something like if he did it the right way, he could see the world from Arnold’s eyes.</p>
<p>dylan: i think that one was that northdale had 10,000 parking spaces? and it was ironic b/c later he hated masses of parking lot</p>
<p>daps: do you remember the other choices? imo that was the hardest question for the whole section</p>
<p>nope, i don’t remember any other ones, but i remember i was confident of my answer choice, unless i misread the question/choices</p>
<p>i didn’t take the sept test and don’t feel like reading through 6 pages of threads, but jw what was the topic of the science reading passage?</p>
<p>@yellowismellow</p>
<p>It was about lions with shorthaired manes being a possibility.</p>
<p>oh, well that isn’t so bad.
good luck you guyss. :3</p>
<p>The way I recall the sentence about the size of the lion’s mane was that:</p>
<p>The researchers concluded that the factors determining the lion’s mane were climate and elevation.</p>
<p>I said that the hormones weakened the conclusion because hormones were not mentioned in the original statement and weakens the statement because the sentence was written in a way that climate and elevation were the ONLY DETERMINING FACTORS of the size of the lion’s mane. Therefore, adding that hormones also factored into the size of the lion’s mane would weaken the original statement. Right?</p>
<p>Hmm, not so sure about the mane one.
I said it had no effect, because obviously it wasn’t strengthened. But it doesn’t change the fact that climate and elevation were factors. I don’t remember the exact sentence though.</p>
<p>If the question about the writer and the whole 30 years thing is that she was unpublished then I got that wrong. So far everything else seems right for me though. Well, I dunno about the mane.</p>
<p>one of the reading answers was the United States…right?</p>
<p>Also, I don’t think the hormones part did anything for the conclusion. The text did not say “only” it said that the mane was a function of climate and whatever else.
So, hormones didn’t weaken it or strengthen the conclusion</p>
<p>yes, united states was the answer.</p>
<p>No effect.</p>
<p>'Nuff said.</p>
<p>Yeah, I also put it had no effect, BUT i wasn’t sure.</p>
<p>Yes, the United States was an answer too.</p>
<p>Can anyone say for sure whether the self creation was:</p>
<p>self-finding herself or unstable life?</p>
<p>i put unstable life, but i was unsure</p>
<p>also, after hearing arnold’s stories, jack thought his previous activities were all childish and he was inexperienced, correct? he stopped mid sentence because he was inexperienced?</p>
<p>Self creation - she wasn’t published and she didn’t have a stable life.</p>
<p>Ok, so far i don’t think i got any wrong on reading, does anyone have any more answers?</p>
<p>and is this correct: also, after hearing arnold’s stories, jack thought his previous activities were all childish and he was inexperienced, correct? he stopped mid sentence because he was inexperienced?</p>
<p>daps, do you remember what the question for that one was? about stopping mid sentence.</p>
<p>i put for the self creation that she was finding herself away from her family or whatever. i don’t know, i kept staring at that one flip flopping between the two choices.</p>