[Real Test Jan 2008] CR help me plssssss

<p>2 Passages is about a self-made businessman named Lapham, who manufactures house paint. In the passage2 , Lapham is being interviewed by Bartley. </p>

<p>PS1:
ALthough I refer to a conifer guide when I'm cross-country skiing. I am still not trustworthy on the difference between a spruce and a fir. But let the smallest piece of commercial-pakaging trash appear along the trail and I can give you the species, genus, and phylum everytime
Much of the litter we bring with us into the wilderness is of mental variety: past a certain point, our minds really cannot grasp places that are completely trash-free. The grape-soda can drawing bees in the middle of a supposedly pristine wilderness campsite provokes our outrage and comfortable and disgust, of course. But underneath those feelings and less comfortable to admit, is a small amount of recognition and even relief. The soda can is us, after all. In 19th century, when the cult of the Scenic had just begun, advertisers (especially in New England) took to plastering giant advertising slogans on the scenery itself. HIKERS who reached lofty lookout points in the Adirodacks or the Berkshires would see the words "visit oak hall" on a rock face in the prospect before them . ( Oak Hall was a Boston clothing store). Even more remarkable is how fre of them seem to have complained)</p>

<p>PS2:
"In less'n six months there wasn't a board-fence, nor a bridge-girder, not a dead wall, nor a barn, nor a face of rock in that whole region that didn't have "Lampham's Mineral Paint-Specimen" on it in the three colors we begun by making".
Lapham continued:"I've heard a good deal of talk a bout that stove-blacking man and the kidney-cure man, because they advertised in theat way and I've read articles about it in the papers, but I don't see where the joke comes in. So long as the people that own the barns and fences don't object, I don't see what public has got to do with it. And I never saw anything so very sacred about a big rock, along a river, that it wouldn't do to put mineral paint on it in thre colors. I wish some of the PEOPLE that talk about landscape, and write about it had to bu'st one of them rocks out of the landscape with powder, or dig a hole to bury it in, as we used to have to do up on the farm: I guess they'd sing a little different tune about the profanation of scenery. They ain't any man enjoys a sightly bit of nature- a smooth pieve of interval with half a dozen good-sized wine-glass elms in it_ more than I do. I ain't a going stand up for every big ugly rock I come across, sd if we were all a set of dumn Druids. I say the landscape was made for man, and not man for landscape."
"Yes", said Bartley carelessly. "It was made for the stove-polish man and the kidney-cure man"
It was made for any man that knows how to use it". Lapham returned , insensible to Bartley's irony. </p>

<p>1)In contrast with the "Hikers", "the people" are: (I've put these words big font)
A. publicly hostile to the defacing of the landscape
B. openly amused by seeing stove-polish ads on rocks
C. exasperated by the public's disregard of their editorials
D. understading of the advertisers's need to promote their products
E. unaware of the revenure that advertising generates
2)Lapham's observations in P2 compared with the author's observations in P1 are
A. less sarcastic
B. less evenhanded
C. less accustatory
D. more resigned
E. more circumspect
3) Which is a belief expressed by Lapham in P2 that is not expressed by the author of P1?
A. That human occupy a privileged position in the natural world
B. That humans are only marginally concerned with preserving nature
C. That one can love natural beauty and still be influenced by Billboards.
D. That the effectiveness of advertising can be enhanced by its location
E. That people identify with the consumer goods that they produce. </p>

<p>1)A 2)B 3)A
These passages seems hard for me. I've read the 2 passages without nothing in my mind. I cannot tell the difference of the the author of P1 and Lapham of P2 :(((
Can you guys make a brief sum of these 2 passages?
Thanks in advanceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee</p>

<p>The passage 1 author says that while he is not good at telling the difference between a spruce and a fir (even though I didn’t know these words, I could guess they are some kind of plants), he recognizes the trash left by humans (cola can, chips bag, other kinds of packages that are well known to us). He says that while we don’t really know nature, we know very well the things that we use (“our minds really cannot grasp places that are completely trash-free”, “the soda can is us”). The author says we are pleased to see things that we recognize. Therefore, when The Scenic cult was writing on rock faces, no one was disturbed by that.</p>

<p>Passage 2
It starts by Lampham saying that “Lampham’s Mineral Paint-Specimen” was written everywhere to advertise it.
Lampham says he read complaints in newspapers (about stove-blacking man and the kidney-cure man who were advertising themselves that way) and that people were disturbed by those writings. Then he tells his opinion that he doesn’t see anything sacred about a rock that you can’t write on it. He says I wonder how would those people talk if a big rock was in the middle of their farm disturbing them. He implies that the rock wouldn’t look so sacred for them anymore. He disagrees with people’s irrational reverence for nature, he says “the landscape was made for man, and not man for landscape.”
The interviewer gives a remark “so you say the rock was made for kidney-man and stove-polish man?” and Lampham says confidently “It was made for any man that knows how to use it”.</p>

<ol>
<li><p>So the hikers were the ones who didn’t mind the writings. “the people” were the ones who complained. Let’s see the choices: A - makes sense. B - they were angry, not amused. C - “editorials” are not the point here. D - they were complaining, not approving. E - that’s not the point. So the answer must be A.</p></li>
<li><p>Concentration on passage2. A- can’t be less sarcastic because it was more sarcastic. B - sounds true. P1 is just an observer from aside, P2 is thinking his own gain. C - P1 didn’t accuse anyone. D - P2 is definitely not resigned. E - more in P1.</p></li>
<li><p>Let’s concentrate of removing everything what wasn’t in P1. A - sounds very P2, I guess that’s the answer. B - “preserving nature” isn’t Lampham’s concern, eliminate. C - only mentioned in P1, eliminate. D - both passages, eliminate. E - P1 material (“soda can is us”), eliminate.</p></li>
</ol>

<p>Well, initially, when I read the blurb, I think that these 2 passages will talk about Lapham’s house paint manufacturing and keep it to my mind, so I keep asking myself what the hell these 2 talk about. Ahaha, thanks to you, I got ittttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt</p>

<p><em>Devout thank</em></p>

<p>Hey, </p>

<p>Could you please PM me the link to the Jan 2008 exam?</p>

<p>Thanks</p>

<p>I have it in my USB, give me your email, then I’ll send it to you</p>

<p>Hey.</p>

<p>Check your inbox.</p>

<p>Yah, I cannot see the following after “@” !!! What’s it?</p>

<hr>

<p>Please send me the Jan 2008 SAT and all other relevant SAT material (especially official tests) which you can put in a compressed folder and upload easily.</p>

<p>Thanks :)</p>