<p>Do you have to have a diagnosis completed in order to get an accommodation, or just list of symptoms that make testing impossible? In other words, acting as if this were a "new" medical problem (which is not), I feel (but who am I?) the symptoms alone are bad enough to interfere with the test-taking process. And that IS the diagnosis, until a medical term can be put on it, which could take a year or more, meanwhile she's at that important jr. year.</p>
<p>On this basis -- severe symptoms, rather than finallly knowing the diagnosis by name -- can the doctor call the CB? Maybe that IS the diagnosis, a description of these symptoms and the names of all the procedures/trials/tests they plan to run in the next year or two to figure it out. Does it have to be in Latin to count?</p>
<p>The fact that the high school already gives her accommodations (best time of day) could be seen as an important precedent that the CB should know about, if they don't already. They like to point to another institution that's already dealt with it, to justify.<br>
If the doctor can't proceed based on symptoms, I'd call and ask a lawyer (if you can afford the consultation fee, that is) who knows LD law (ask Special Ed teachers at your school for names) and see if they're required to make an accommodation. I know they say they'll accommodate a medical diagnosis, but see if the lawyer can relate to my idea that the symptoms are the diagnosis. Who cares WHY someone vomits without so many meals; right now, you know with fair certainty that she DOES. Why isn't that enough. (Oh I get so steamed on your behalf!) There must be something about being unable to sit for 5 hours that a lawyer can use.</p>
<p>If so, then there's no need to make a lawsuit. So many times, a call or short note with legal letterhead kick-starts bureaucracies to SOLVE problems or MANAGE to "reach" the other party by phone. A phone call or one-paragraph letter from a lawyer, merely "inquiring" about that case and "hoping" for communication between parties, might get the CB on the phone with the doctor, or vice-versa, pronto. </p>
<p>That's NOT being litigious. That's avoiding lawsuits and solving problems.
So much of what's in our way in society is impossible non-communication between decision-makers. </p>
<p>My son is studying for AP Government and he tells me that they don't teach 3 branches of government any more (as I learned: Legislative, Executive, Judicial...). The fourth branch of government is Bureaucracy. And that's how it's taught now.</p>
<p>WHILE you decide if you can pursue this issue hard, like a tiger, I agree with Marian and the poster who sent a big list of schools that don't require the SAT's. </p>
<p>"Hard guy" and "soft guy" can go on at the same time, perhaps.</p>
<p>Does anyone have a suggestion how to make that list (of non-SAT colleges) more manageable to explore? (Hint; if you were on your way to rabbinic school or yeshiva, you'd know it by now so certainly cross off anything with "rabbinic, torah, or yeshiva" for advanced orthodox jewish study of Torah.)</p>
<p>I'm a big fan of many schools on that list. In my travels, places like Hampshire, Bard and Antioch might offer continued opportunities for scheduling flexibility or ways to do majors that might appeal to your daughter once in college. Connecticut College is right up there academically. Marian pointed out some larger places she likes. Great list -- just needs some focus for our OP, perhaps. </p>
<p>I'm aware that the OP had an ED place in mind, so I don't want to tread on that either. But why is it the ED, and could another place serve as well? Worth a thought, dear OP, since you're so thoughtful.
Hugs to you, too.</p>