<p>Is the aforementioned title a reliable random discrete variable?</p>
<p>It seemed highly unlikely to me, but after carefully using the basic tenets of AP Statistics (discrete variables and z-scores), it could be a possibility.</p>
<p>I have already received * two * rejection letters, and I am crestfallen.</p>
<p>My schools are:
[ul]
[<em>]Princeton
[</em>]Yale
[<em>]Stanford
[</em>]Columbia
[<em>]Harvard
[</em>]University of Cambridge
[<em>]Duke
[</em>]Northwestern
[<em>]Amherst
[</em>]Brown
[<em>]Dartmouth
[</em>]Cornell
[<em>]Johns Hopkins
[</em>]UCL
[<em>]University of Chicago
[</em>]UPenn
[<em>]WUSTL
[</em>]London School of Economics
[/ul]</p>
<p>are there any safeties that you forget to list?
And well it depends on your Stats…If gpa is like a 2.0 and you got 1700 on your SAT’s then ya it looks kinda bleak : L But I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you are a good scholar. If that IS the case, then I’m sure that those 2 rejections will be followed by ATLEAST 2 letters saying you were accepted :)</p>
<p>Why would you apply to all of those schools with knowing full well that you can only attend 1. Im not trying rain on your parade but it is statistially possible for you to get rejected from every one of those schools. I doubt it will actually happen but really you’ll just have to wait and see.</p>
<p>Dear * mangocandy4 *- Thank you for your inquiry. Yes, I do have safety schools. However, they are not US colleges.</p>
<p>Dear * futurexecutive*- Thank you for your inquiry; I was rejected from two courses, from a single college- London School of Economics.</p>
<p>Dear * ephenst*- Thank you for your genuine concern. It was an ordeal for me to cautiously narrow down my choices; however, those were my final schools.
You have accentuated your diction “rain on your parade”; this has indeed been an apt term. Thank you for your contribution.</p>
<p>mangocandy4- Your apt diction, along with your heartwarming post, has been a great joy to me.
Thank you, I am indeed a good scholar (I apologize for any subjective qualities in my aforementioned post; this is not narcissism).</p>
<p>CelaPlusAimaple- Thank you for your abstruse, yet facetious contribution.
As you felicitously point out, a diversity of human beings exists. The philosophical aspect of this quote relies on the basis that people are inherently different from each other.
Through your pithy aphorism, you clearly capture the versatility of mankind. One of the prime examples of this aforementioned assertion can be found in nothing4me’s posts.</p>
<p>Am I right so far?
What attributes of nothing4me have elicited your previous post?</p>
Thank you for your sound advice. However, I do not see any problems in my diction.</p>
<p>
It seems like the consensus has been made that I often employ vivid diction.
I fully agree; however, I find all my epithets to be apt.
Thank you for your kind suggestion.</p>