<p>^^^Could not have said it better</p>
<p>I do not see Bill Gates or Steven Hawkins respond to someone in public with:</p>
<p>Thank you for your abstruse, yet facetious contribution.
or
thank you for your inquiry</p>
<p>Jozhekryx <3</p>
<p>Post more pl0x.</p>
<p>Sir Master Jozhekryx</p>
<p>If you are willing to comply with this upcoming statement, I would be most honored to allude you to a festive banquet at my humble home in west hartford Connecticut.
Here is my personal information
My birthday is March 26th 1993, I will be turning 18. I also received a 2200 on my recent SAT. I am a White Male and my father went to Yale.
If you want anymore personal information: for example, my clothing sizes, my mothers weight, or how much my father makes, then please do not hesitate to post an elaborate response to my upcoming inquiry
On to my well thought out and complex statement:</p>
<p>Could you please post the most ridiculous and unpractical jargon of words that has EVER been posted on college confidential? As my above paragraph said, I will allow you to feast with me in my castle, where we will sip tea and laugh at the peasants under our noble/elite rule.</p>
<p>Not gonna lie, this thread is hella entertaining.</p>
<p>You my friend the OP is a Pseudo-Intellect, if you have no clue what it means, come have a look at this dictionary. A picture of you next to the definition is very fitting. </p>
<p>[Urban</a> Dictionary: pseudo-intellectual](<a href=“http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=pseudo-intellectual]Urban”>Urban Dictionary: pseudo-intellectual)</p>
<p>I think OP stopped responding</p>
<p>I rarely do this but…</p>
<p>:(</p>
<p>I like the OP, as I said. Listen to meddo. She’s always right.</p>
<p>
Correct, by all evidence
also correct - ye be warn’d</p>
<p>
[quote=SLightManifesto
]
…OP, why do you type like that?
[/quote]
Thank you for your pithy comment. However, let me clarify you the situation. I am not seeking for any posts which castigate my writing style. Let me “pull” a “Socrates” and ask you the same question. Why do * you * type like that? I value coherence.
I find your post to be an intriguing one. According to your logic, if one expresses his or her thoughts in a coherent manner, one becomes a malicious ■■■■■. Please carefully list instances which support your notion, for I believe your comment to be simply captious.
Honourable eurosport360, I fully understand your point. However, it is a naive comment with full of callous remarks. Let me palliate your notion. How do you define a “Yale” doctorate thesis? Your simple connotation with the term “Yale” has led you to commit a grave logical fallacy.
One point for me I guess.
Next point- let us analyze your second reason of vilification.
To answer your second question, yes. However, your thesis lacks substantial proof and comes across to me as a relatively unsophisticated brouhaha. Thus, your argument will easily be subdued within seconds. Some blog * site <a href=“if%20you%20are%20telling%20me%20what%20to%20do,%20go%20learn%20your%20phonetics%20first,%20so%20we%20can%20have%20a%20truly%20meaningful%20debate”>/i</a> does not justify how I have written my college essay. I find your aforementioned argument to be simply preposterous. My college essay seeks to vividly depict my ambitions, hopes, fears, and dreams (I apologize for the trite list).
Thank you for your witty remark. However, I am in full control of my words- that is, I know how to use them correctly.
Thank you for your platonic love.
Honestly, the low standards of High School Life have left me in a crestfallen state. All of the aforementioned words are * not * complex- as you might describe it.
I value coherence in words.
Don’t you posters pay attention in your respective English Language classes?</p>
<p>
I am not a pseudo-intellectual, for none of the aforementioned epithets fits my current state. I do not use “big” words to impress people. I use coherent words. I do not insist on being politically-correct. I do not castigate about the “system”. I am not an atheist, for I am Christian.</p>
<p>
Your idiocy just made me laugh out loud (lol).
It is Stephen Hawking.
You seem to commit a glut of logical fallacies. Bill Gates does not represent coherent use of words.</p>
<p>We have digressed from the original prompt.
Anyone with a substantial thesis?</p>
<p>
Pardon me while I faint over here, I think I just fell in love with a ■■■■■.</p>
<p>They’re not complex in the slightest, but using a large amount of sophisticated vocabulary is overkill, even my English professors say that.</p>
<p>wanton:
Pardon me while I faint over here, I think I just fell in love with a ■■■■■.
Thank you for your remark, but your logical reasoning lacks proof.</p>
<p>MIThopeful16:
Your notion is invalid.</p>
<p>Explain why.</p>
<p>Look, this is his forum he started, he’s free to do whatever he wants within the rules of CC, and isn’t bothering anyone, except those who bother him (on this forum itself, don’t know where else he comments on). </p>
<p>My question to you, is why do you care so much to spend time responding to every nearly post with concise replies? Do you really care what anonymous people think about you? It’s safe to say you have very high vocabulary, and assumably higher intelligence, so why not refocus more of that time working on studies or elsewhere rather than commenting lengthy responses to anonymous jerk heads like us. :)</p>
<p>I am only involved, because this is pretty interesting, and I wish good will and luck for your academic journey, and want to do my small share of perhaps bringing some perspective to (y)our lives. </p>
<p>PS, are you involved in journalistic or debate or other scholarly academic extracurricular? I think you’d enjoy it, if you haven’t even done so yet.</p>
<p>Please send me your private STATS, I am genuinely interested,</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Is it possible for logical reasoning to lack proof? I was going to type out some quip about that, but really, can someone explain the circumstances around that to me? I don’t think I know much.</p>
<p>OP, if you say “aformentioned” one more time in this thread, the world might implode.</p>
<p>
My logical reasoning is this- if the sophisticated terms amalgate into a coherent piece of writing, the purpose has been fulfilled.
Yes, indeed.
My writing intended to serve one purpose- to accentuate the role of Jozhekryx in an online forum- I am not a malicious ■■■■■.
Thank you for your concise remark. It is weekend- and while my friends are partying, I decided to revise some of my essays.
However, College Confidential has become a healthy addiction of mine.</p>
<p>
Truly ironic remark.
One must be able to spell the word “aforementioned” to be in full control of the word.
Obviously, you do not fit the epithet.</p>