How could that possibly highlight our differences? The OP is not a minor. Anyway, you are contradicting yourself. Your first argument was:
</p>
<p>You are cracking me up, man. The general belief is that the law is imposed because adult-child sex is inherently harmful, not manipulative. I’ve actually seen a peer-reviewed meta-analysis that disproved that (inherent harmfulness), but again, it’s completely irrelevant.</p>
<p>You aren’t keeping a straight argument and are continuing to misuse an important term. This is going nowhere.</p>