<p>One thing to be careful of is that the school districts don’t always allign exactly with the associated town. For example, the east side of Naperville is in District 203 and the west side (along with a portion of Aurora) is in District 204. Waubonsee High School, mentioned in the previous post, is in District 204 and a good portion of it’s students are from Naperville. (So the previous posters ascertain that Wabonsie is better because it doesn’t have the stuck up rich kids from Naperville isn’t exactly true, although I do believe it to be more economically diverse. On the other hand, Nequa Valley, another high school in District 204 is known to have some of the richest, most stuck up, obnoxious kids in the country, mainly living in very transient, expensive subdivisions (lots of corporate transferees.) </p>
<p>Some very basic differences between the two districts. District 203, being landlocked, hasn’t experienced much growth in a number of years. On the other hand, District 204 has seen explosive growth and hence has higher property taxes to pay for all the new schools. (In fact, be careful of property taxes in any of the outlying school districts which have seen consideable growth in recent years, such as Plainfield noted in an earlier post.) In fact, they recently passed a referendum to raise taxes again to build a third high school. Apparently, there is a lawsuit pending from a group of parents pointing to the new high school location (a bit off the beaten path) that will cause the school boundaries (elementary, junior high, and high school) to differ from what they were promised when they voted on the referendum. Some just don’t like their kids suddently being destined to travel further (bused) to school and others just preferred certain schools over others. They are all good schools, so I can’t see the point myself. One nice thing about District 204 I’ve noticed, is that they cut a deal with the College of Dupage (local community college) that provides high school students the opportunity to take college level classes in place of high school classes their senior year. Even leased a building nearby one of the high schools to house the classes. Gives a big head start on accumulating college credit.</p>
<p>With respect to property taxes, District 203 just passed a referendum to raise money to essentially rebuild one (very old) of their two high schools. So kids going there within next few years might have to put up with considerable construction. Also, with respect to the earlier post on competive high schools resulting in lower class rank when applying to colleges, District 203 recently dropped determining and reporting class ranks for that reason. As a result, acceptances at the hard to get into flagship state university actually went up a few percent for the district. Overall, I tend to like the atmosphere of District 203 better (older part of town and more down to earth, less competive, although they have their share, people.) Academically, both districts are neck and neck.</p>
<p>Bottom line is that if schools is your primary consideration, you really need to know the intimate details of what is going on in those districts, in addition to ACT scores. </p>
<p>One other warning, I’ve heard of people buying in subdivisions in the Chicago area (especially one still under development) in which the developer claimed belonged in a much sought after school district, only to find out after buying the house, they are really in nearby, not so good school district. Best to check with the school district directly before buying the house.</p>