<p>So, apparently Rielle Hunter cried for 2 hours after seeing her photos in GQ. IMO they should have been no surprise. I mean, she WAS present at the shoot, right? She knew what she was (wasn't?) wearing, right?</p>
<p>Good grief. Doesn't anyone THINK before they DO anymore?</p>
<p>I saw the pictures online. How could she not know how they would look? For starters, she’s not wearing pants. Note to Rielle, if you have to pick between pearls and pants, go with the pants. Her makeup and hair are appropriate if there’s money on the nightstand. </p>
<p>She should be in UGQ - Un Gentlemen’s Quarterly.</p>
<p>:D Rielle obviously has a screw loose. Given her father’s history, the apple did not fall far from the tree. I really worry about that poor kid.</p>
<p>I heard she cried also. I do not have sympathy for her at all. When you play, you pay. She gets what she deserves.</p>
<p>Hellooooo, she was in a photo shoot for GQ, not Ladies Home Journal, what kind of pictures did she think was going to make the pages. Did she not know her pants weren’t on for some of the pictures?</p>
<p>The only redeeming thing about Rielle is she exposed John Edwards for the kind of man he was and he could have very well been the president.</p>
<p>It was on the radio news today - as I was driving to the club. You know, the news you listen to for weather and traffic updates. Says he had sex the FIRST time she met dear “Johnny” and that he was deathly scared of the “witch” at home. Glad that I didn’t have young kids in the car.
Re the pics…here she is getting her panties in a bunch…about pics that show her not wearing panties. lol. Next time, keep them on!</p>
<p>Did she really refer to Elizabeth Edwards as a witch? Of ALL the people in the world who should NOT be throwing stones! And god forbid she consider the feelings of the Edwards’ children…</p>
Yes. I normally don’t react much to stuff like this, it’s such a bore, but the shot of her holding her daughter really disturbed me. If you want to turn a quick buck from your status as a celebrity adulterer, go ahead, but for pete’s sake have the good taste and good sense to leave your poor kid out of it. Hire a freaking babysitter. I’m sure GQ paid you enough for one.</p>
<p>And I agree there is something obscene, with her sitting on a bed wearing nothing but that shirt and pearls surrounded by stuffed animals. :eek:</p>
<p>OK…she didn’t actually call her a witch…but that’s what stayed in my head after I heard the radio broadcast. Here’s what she actually said (not much better!)</p>
<p>"And I believe what happened in his marriage is, he could not go to his wife and say, “We have an issue.” Because he would be pummeled. So he had a huge fear. Most of his mistakes or errors in judgment were because of his fear of the wrath of Elizabeth. He’s allowed himself to be pushed into a lot of things that he wouldn’t normally do because of Elizabeth’s story line. And the spin that she wants to put out there. He was emasculated. And you know, the wrath of Elizabeth is a mighty wrath. "</p>
<p>I agree - ‘witch’ wouldn’t have been much worse! So - Edwards’ actions can be blamed on his fear of Elizabeth and her “storyline” (incurable cancer). Pore ol’ John. They deserve each other! But, yes, that poor kid-</p>