<p>mojojojo69, I know you have good intentions, but you have approached this subject in terrible fashion. It is not nice to allege well-meaning posters, who have taken the time and effort to respond, to accuse us of "sugarcoating," that we are somehow actively misinforming to get a point across. With all due respect, we eat, sleep, and drink Berkeley every day and we know better than anyone. And for you to come on to these boards and exclaim "the REALITY is that it's not; UCLA is much safer" is nothing short of disrespect and pure arrogance. </p>
<p>Without a doubt, the most objectable offense is your insistence on hearing about other's miseries just so you can see "how bad it can get." In fact, in one your posts, you even mentioned in name "rape": *** do you expect from us- "Oh yeah, I was totally raped last night"? Would that satisfy your need in understanding "how bad it can get"? Your timing is particularly insensitive due to increased focus on violence in college. While most of Cal students do not have direct relations to the victims, or even the school Virginia Tech, we have all felt, to some degree, of the reverberations of its impact in our community. </p>
<p>In the context of these boards, "horror stories" have been shared without fail in this season of college decisions where current Cal students, instead of looking to share their wonderful experiences and discuss the many things they love about our school, we've found ourselves on the defensive more than anything else. Not surprisingly, it has taken its toll as you can tell by some of the responses in this thread. Perhaps you were the straw that broke the camel's back and that you've received more than your fair share of flak, but you certainly haven't helped your cause in follow-up posts. </p>
<p>Note that by soliciting personal stories, opinions, or comparisons is not working towards an unbiased response: the answers will be completely subjective. If objectivity is your intent, then you are more than welcome to look over these crime statistics made available online, as required by the national Clery Act. </p>
<p><a href="http://police.berkeley.edu/annual_report/2005/berkeley/FBI_Part1_Part2_Crimes.html%5B/url%5D">http://police.berkeley.edu/annual_report/2005/berkeley/FBI_Part1_Part2_Crimes.html</a>
<a href="http://police.berkeley.edu/annual_report/2005/los_angeles/FBI_Part1_Part2_Crimes.html%5B/url%5D">http://police.berkeley.edu/annual_report/2005/los_angeles/FBI_Part1_Part2_Crimes.html</a></p>
<p>In addition, here's a map of crime occurrency in the entire city of Berkeley, broken down by neighborhoods:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ci.berkeley.ca.us/police/crimestats/crimestatmap.html%5B/url%5D">http://www.ci.berkeley.ca.us/police/crimestats/crimestatmap.html</a></p>
<p>I spent quite a while searching through the LAPD website, and also trying to see if Cal has access to archived national crime statistics through subscription or otherwise, but LAPD crime statistics are shockingly limited in scope, aside from availability. To me, this is slightly disconcerting (what are they trying to hide?). For now, we must make due with what university police data suggests, but I will say that if and when you do go make judgments about areas around each campus, that you don't rush to judgment. The links above suggest that campus violence at both schools are roughly equal, which begs the question: who is perpetrating these acts? My best guess is that the violators do not restrict their activity to campus... UCLA, Cal, and all schools in urban settings are targets for crime; saying otherwise is completely ignorant.</p>