<p>Sorry everyone for posting another of these vs. threads~ (May 1 is getting closer). But I really don't want to make a decision that I wants to regret. I have about the same amount of financial aid from both schools (Partt gave more more scholarship but less grant and work study money) and costs about the same (both ridiculous), and I love both of the city. And I don't really have to worry about the liberal art courses because I'm transferring from a university and already got most of those out of the way.</p>
<p>SAIC pros: prestige, especially for Fine Art majors which is what I'm signing up for right now.</p>
<p>Graduate classes/facilities accessible to undergraduate students - what my touring guide told me.</p>
<p>Cons: have to be self motivated - not saying that I'm just paying a more than 20K to slack off, but the low percentage of students who graduates in four years is a bit worrying. Also there's that thing I heard about, how SAIC focuses on the 20% percent and the rest just kind of floats around (I was stupid enough to bring this up in a meeting with one of their counselor, who probably hates me now, another con I guess?)</p>
<p>Too conceptual? I became more interested in conceptual art after being exposed to more of them in college, but I'm definately still exploring how I ultimately want to make art (which is why the fact that they are interdisciplinary is a another huge pro), so if the black box in the middle of the room thing is the only way they go, I can imagine myself quite miserable there.</p>
<p>And also, I'm still not dead set on this fine artist thing, and if I later decided that I want something more commercial, going to SAIC would be a bit of a waste of resources (and I'm not transferring again!)</p>
<p>Basically, all those cons of SAIC would be a pro to Pratt, considering how they are more of a design school.</p>