Sarah Palin thinks only small towns are pro-America

[applejack]

<p>Well, Logicwarrior, if wikipedia says so, I guess you must be right. All Hail.</p>

<p>Actually, self proclaimed warrior of all that is logical, the link you posted revealed quite a large degree of voter suppression and discrepencies in the polling. </p>

<p>Here’s one side:
[Was</a> the 2004 Election Stolen? : Rolling Stone](<a href=“Music News”>Music News)</p>

<p>Here’s the a rebuttal:
[2004</a> Presidential Election Stolen by George Bush? A response to the Robert F. Kennedy Rolling Stone article | Salon News](<a href=“http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2006/06/03/kennedy/]2004”>http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2006/06/03/kennedy/)</p>

<p>Even the rebuttal, while clarifying Kennedy’s overstatements and questioning whether Blackwell’s illicit activities could have swung the vote, still states:</p>

<p>

To date, dozens of experts, both independently and as part of several research panels, have spent countless hours examining 2004’s presidential election, especially the race in Ohio. Many of them have concluded that the election there strains conventional notions of what a democracy ought to look like; very little about that race was fair, clean or competent. Way back in January 2005, a panel headed by Democratic Rep. John Conyers of Michigan reported that it had found enough irregularities in Ohio to call into question the state election results and the entire presidential vote.

</p>

<p>Whether the criminal acts were necessary or not, our White House has been hijacked by those who tried to throw an election. Yet, somehow I’m kind of happy it happened. The dark energy could not have fully gestated and collapsed without 2005-2006. We will not see a Republican Party that drunkenly beligerant or a Democratic Party that spineless for a long time to come.</p>