<p>Will I be well prepared to get about a 750+ (I'd even settle for 700+ :P) on the SAT Bio M? I am a senior, and I took freshman Biology, aced it, and as a senior am in AP Bio. With a good grasp of polar/non-polar, hydrogen bonding, electromagnetically, glycolysis, Krebs cycle, electron transport chain, ATP/ADP/phosphorylation, amino acids, DNA, photosynthesis, proteins/protein structure, some organic molecules, lipids, osmosis/diffusion, cell membranes, hyper/hypotonic, water potential, enzymes, and cellular respiration, am I prepared? Also, what about the SAT Bio E, with the only experience I have is self study last year for AP Environmental Science (5)? On that note, which is "better" in the eyes of colleges for an CS major? (Too bad they don't have a CS subject test, and I am required to take Math II and "a science based" SAT II) Which am I better prepared for? What are the major differences in the two tests? Or should I take both?</p>
<p>Bump? 10char</p>
<p>Check the Spark Notes SAT II bio
[SparkNotes:</a> SAT Subject Test: Biology](<a href=“SparkNotes: Today's Most Popular Study Guides”>SparkNotes: Today's Most Popular Study Guides)</p>
<p>If you’re not familiar with most info in all these chapters, then you need some more preparation.</p>
<p>Ok, what about E vs M? As in difficulty and how it “looks” to colleges?</p>
<p>Many people find E to be easier, but personally I find M questions to be more clear and easier to answer than E questions.
As for colleges, I have no idea. Sorry.</p>
<p>Bumpity bump!</p>