<p>HELP!!!!</p>
<p>i'm taking bio 6/2 and i got the princeton book a while ago and have gone through it and feel confortable with everything (got 770 on practice test) but i just bought barron's and it has TONS of info that isn't in Princeton. (princeton doesn't even mention photosynthesis)</p>
<p>which is a more accurate representation of what's on the real test?</p>
<p>Also, what does a 770 on princeton practice test translate to on the real thing?
thanks alot!!!!!</p>
<p>If you know the barron’s fully, you’re going to get an 800.</p>
<p>^ Is that really true? I’m about 200 pages into Barron’s, and it’s easy so far. Perhaps it’s because I used Cliff’s for the AP exam, which is very detailed.</p>
<p>sorry, i think you(masteryster) misunderstand my question</p>
<p>is the info in princeton review sufficient or is the extra info in barron’s necesarry (chapter on photosynthesis, section on asexual reproduction, etc)
Thanks alot</p>
<p>The fact that the Princeton Review doesn’t include photosynthesis is shocking and quite honestly bad. Review it</p>
<p>Princeton does have a photosynthesis section, it’s just with all of the plant stuff in the plant chapter. However, it isn’t that comprehensive compared to the chapter in the cliff’s book.</p>
<p>Hey would Princeton Review be enough for an 800?</p>
<p>^ On its own, probably not. Supplemented by a rigorous AP Bio class, quite possibly.</p>
<p>^
Yet Barron’s on its own is sufficient for an 800? I took AP Bio this year, but I don’t think I retained all of the information. I mean, the AP Test was a whole two weeks ago, haha.</p>
<p>^ On its own, it’s a lot better than PR.</p>