<p>Which one is generally "better" looking at curves and test material, (if any) I know it depends on your strengths, but generally if you've taken it, which one did you feel was better?</p>
<p>EXTRA Q: anyone taken SAT II U.S, History? How was it?</p>
<p>go with molecular biology.</p>
<p>I think I am taking molecular biology in May (permitting that I don't re-take the SAT I). I have Kaplan's book, and it seems to be fairly helpful. I have taken the highest biology class my school has to offer (which was only honors, no AP classes there) and I knew most of what was on the practice tests.</p>
<p>I don't know if Barron's makes a Bio M study guide, but if they do, I would recommend it. Barron's always tends to over-prepare you for tests, then they seem rather easy when you take the real thing, which is always a plus.</p>
<p>I did BioE, I'll find out next friday how I did... it seemed easier than the Bio M looked.</p>
<p>Biology M was easier for me (I got an 800 on both) but Biology E is a really fun test and the concepts are cooler. Come on, who doesn't like evolution and ecology? Watch out, all you secondary consumers, I'm a tertiary consumer and an apex predator! Holler to all us K-strategists!</p>
<p>Still not sure...but leaning towards M right now.</p>
<p>Looking at the study guide, M seems to be more factual while E you can figure a lot out on your own (if you know the vocabulary). I don't know how everyone else's biology class was conducted, but mine we spent 8 months on molecular biology and 1 month on environmental biology and ecology.</p>