<p>How accurate in regards to being like the real thing would you say are these SAT tests? </p>
<p>Practice</a> SAT II Bio Tests</p>
<p>Which one of them is as close as possible to the real SAT II Bio test?
I'm using PR to review and prep; is that enough to get me a 750+ on the test?</p>
<p>If anyone has any suggestions for more accurate practice tests, please share links :)</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
<p>I took the Barron’s test and it was impossible. I took the real test yesterday and it was easier, but not as easy as the questions on the CB website.</p>
<p>Thanks for the info. </p>
<p>Does anyone else have some advice or an answer to my questions?</p>
<p>The real test should be a little easier, I believe. The real test won’t have as much about lenticels and paliside guard cells and other leaf/plant anatomy. More general knowledge. If you are getting 85+% on this these tests, you should get 750+. I took AP bio and SAT2 and did pretty well! </p>
<p>There is also a decent curve, and usually no trick questions. Really basic stuff, a good overview is found in Barron’s Bio e/m. </p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
<p>Barrons are the best reference book out there, but the practice tests aren’t very close to the real thing. TPR’s practice tests are more accurate.</p>