SAT II Biology, molecular or ecology

<p>i don't know if i should take the molecular or ecology section. i think i know them equally well...does one look better than the other?</p>

<p>a friend of mine is really good in molecular bio, but he took the ecology option on a whim and got a 770. he said it's pretty easy stuff, a lot easier than molecular, so maybe ecology is right for you. imagine, ecology and you, a match made in heaven. it's a divine calling! or something.</p>

<p>You can look it over and decide on the spot i've heard.
E curve is better.</p>

<p>Yeah, assuming you have enough time, just look over both sets of questions and answer the set that's easier for you for that particular test.</p>

<p>Isnt the E curve more harsh than the M curve, so if you miss questions on the E test, you lose more points right than you would have on the M test right?</p>

<p>no, e curve is better, but slightly. i got like 8-10 wrong and ended up with 770. Look at Real SAT II's.</p>

<p>i dont know for sure if there is a curve difference, but I do know that it also helps to take which ever your class prepares you for most.</p>

<p>i can also depend on your chemistry background also... if you are strong on chem, it overlaps with the molecular side of biology alot, and that made it easier for me to do</p>

<p>Molecular is more complex, its a lot of abstract crap and memorization if you're good at that. Ecology i find easier, its like population growth and easier to understand material.</p>