SAT II: Biology VS Chemistry

<p>I posted this question within another thread but it was kind of off the topic so I'm posting on this one. Anyways my question was "which test do you guys think is easier to score in higher percentiles on: SAT II Chem. or SAT II Bio?"</p>

<p>"Which one would be easier to study for without the class?"
I've taken Biology over the summer of my 9th grade year and I'm taking Chemistry right now (10th grade)
I'm planning on taking either bio or chem SAT II next year in conjunction with taking a AP Physics class, so I want to get some opionions on whether to study for the Chem. or the Bio. exam even though I don't have the class.</p>

<p>bumping...</p>

<p>I have heard that it is much better to have AP Chemistry. The SAT II Biology exam is mostly memorization, so I would go for that. Just buy a review book and study a textbook to refresh yourself in the material. But then again, why not study for both and take them in the fall?</p>

<p>Thanks for the advice, but the thing is I'm preparing for the SAT I in Oct./ SAT II Math IIC for Nov. and I think it would be extremely difficult to prep. for both chem and bio at the same time as prep. for SAT I and SAT II Math IIC.</p>

<p>What would you guys do if you were in my shoes?</p>

<p>I'd say biology, if you plan to study. In Chemistry, it's easy to miss a question from a stupid mistake even if you understand the concept.</p>

<p>Why not physics, if you are taking AP physics? Unless of course you are applying for some college program that requires bio or chem.</p>

<p>I'm planning to take physics but in conjunction which other science should I take?</p>

<p>Take Lit or USH instead of a science you haven't taken a course in. That way you don't have to prep.</p>

<p>bio is def much easier then chemistry</p>