<p>I'm signed up to take the January SAT II in Math (IIC). I haven't really started preparing. I'm using the Barrron's book, but it seems really hard, and it's going by slow. I also have the Princeton Review book from the library (but the PR book covers Math I and Math II...I don't know if they all come like that?) Which practice tests seem the most realistic, and how do you think that I should prepare?</p>
<p>Princeton has realistic tests and Barron's is well known for being intimidating but also overpreparing for the test. If you just want to know what's on the test to get a 700+, I'd go with PR.</p>
<p>barron's sux!
use pr</p>
<p>haha...thanks guys!</p>
<p>What about arco? In my mind, arco is about as difficult as barron's, but anyways, arco's tests are a whole lot harder than Princeton review. Can someone confirm me?</p>
<p>If you go with the harder books and "over prepare" like with Barrons, do you think that you might do better on the test than if you had prepared with a book like PR?</p>