SAT II: U.S. History Discussion May 2009

<p>yes they do!</p>

<p>790! Yayyyyyy</p>

<p>wrong thread…my bad.</p>

<ol>
<li> I’m pretty sure i got murked by the questions that were post 1965 and pre-Jamestown</li>
</ol>

<p>770! Yay!!!</p>

<ol>
<li>Not to shabby!</li>
</ol>

<p>800 (10 char)</p>

<p>730! is this going to help or hurt for schools like brown/stanford?</p>

<p>Hey. To those who got 780+, WHAT BOOKS DID YOU USE?</p>

<p>please suggest for the june takers.</p>

<p>Amsco all the way.</p>

<p>I used REA and the College Board released tests.</p>

<p>^by that, do you mean REA crash course?</p>

<p>Can I ask where you found the Collegeboard’s released tests? =/ This might sound a bit stupid, sorry. But I’m having difficulty locating them.</p>

<p>Collegeboard came out with a World History/US History only book that has two tests for each subject. Used both of those tests and got an 800 on the actual</p>

<p>What CC means ?</p>

<p>I assume you’re referring to the book. If so, CC stands for Crash Course.</p>

<p>Thanks for explaining CC for me. I did refer to book. I used AMSCO to prepare AP test. Did pretty good. After that, I am using Barron SAT II study guide also. I felt it is organized in a very strange way. And I can only score around 700. Do you think it is good idea to go through Crash Course in a week instead of Barron SAT II ?</p>

<p>I’m not sure which is better since i haven’t used Barron’s for history but at the very least you could probably read CC more than once since it is so short/condensed.</p>

<p>780 :)</p>

<p>my class applauded me when i told my teacher. i’m pretty sure only 2 out of about 100 of his AP USH kids took it though.</p>

<p>we didn’t even reach vietnam war and i didn’t study much.</p>

<p>on question 49 it says statehood= NW ordinance</p>

<p>what does nw ordinance have to do with statehood</p>