<p>It seems like the SAT II WH test is a lot harder than the AP WH test.</p>
<p>On the AP I was able to get 58/70 right in the MC section, but on the SAT II I was able to, with practice, only score a 690.</p>
<p>I don't understand, the SAT II questions for me take a lot less time to answer (95 questions all in less than 30 minutes, because it's either you know it or not), while the AP's test whether you know it or not (no clues will help you on either) and take a lot longer to essay, but I score better on the AP.</p>
<p>What are the primary differences between these 2 exams? I have my SAT II WH test this Saturday, and I gotta know</p>
<p>the ap exam is more analysis, while the sat II is more facts</p>
<p>I’m taking the World History exam next week too, and personally I think that the SAT is at most 25% as hard as the AP Exam. It’s basically fact recognition. You don’t even have to think about the names because it’s already printed down there on the test for you.</p>
<p>the SATII mc are more detail-oriented & the test goes more in-depth than the AP mc, and make sure you know your European history as it’s a larger part of the SATII. for the World AP mc questions there’s more analysis of passages, etc. (especially because of the recent AP change) whereas the SATII is more fact recall.</p>
<p>Yeahhh the SAT II World was definitely harder. I got a 730 (which sucks) on SAT II World and a 5 on the AP</p>
<p>ya i think sat 2 is a lot harder</p>