<p>Do SAT II scores count more than SAT I scores?</p>
<p>Yes, it is given more weight because the adcoms want to know you are good at specific subjects instead of the fact that you can reason well (for SAT I).</p>
<p>Ok what would you retake then?
SATI 780M 660CR 610 WR
SATII 770M2c 720BI 680WH</p>
<p>Possibly the world history?</p>
<p>You should retake SAT Is.</p>
<p>but do we have time to retake any SAT's? I thought the score was supposed to be turned in by JAN 28.</p>
<p>800 M
750 W
730 Cr</p>
<p>720 Lit
720 Math IC
770 Bio</p>
<p>Are the test scores adequate?</p>
<p>SAT I is more than fine; maybe try to get those SATIIs up a little. 750+ is nice.</p>
<p>But, regardless, your scores are good enough not to hurt your application. Other factors are more important.</p>
<p>SAT II scores arent that important. A 650 wouldn't ruin your chances.</p>
<p>Wait a minute. On what exactly are you basing statements like "SAT II scores count for more" or "SAT II scores aren't that important"? </p>
<p>Historically, most people have assumed that SAT I scores are more important. A few people, however, were surprised to find out that SAT II scores counted for just as much in the Ivy Academic Index. Honestly, I don't think anyone, including admission officers, can answer the question; the process is far too qualitative and personal.</p>
<p>That said, if I had to give a hunch, I would say that many people underrate the importance of SAT IIs. When I've read books written by admissions officers that discuss "case studies", they almost always take special note when SAT IIs are significantly higher than the SAT I. This is interpreted as a sign of strong achievement - even overachievement - which colors the entire perception of a candidate.</p>