<p>hey everybody i hhave a question regarding the prep books for MATH IIC.
I'll keep it simple. What do y'all suggest between Barrons And Princeton Review? Please dont tell me the advantages or disadvantages or anything.. just tell me which one is better...</p>
<p>thanks a lot!!</p>
<p>Barron's..</p>
<p>hmm.. okay anybody else???</p>
<p>You can benefit from both. But I think that Barron's is more difficult so it is better. The sample tests in the book are better
:)</p>
<p>okay bromista thanks... i guess barrons has everything thats more difficult!!</p>
<p>mhm:) but you can make the test from both books...</p>
<p>Eh. I have Kaplan's and Mcgraw-hill's. Kaplan has no reviews online yet..Mcgraw-hill's has some nasty reviews. It's really a pity that they don't have the PR or the Barrons for Math II over here..so weird. They have them for some subjects and not for others. :/</p>
<p>I had Barron's but found it disorganized and way too difficult. I then borrowed PR from a friend, and found it really helped. Even though it's Math I and II together, it's very beneficial. The real test mirrored the PR practice tests. Also, do the Sparknotes free tests (just sign up and make new accounts)--they also pretty much mirrored the test. Some of the question types on both were exactly the same but with different numbers on the real test. I was expecting between a 650-700 on the test and wound up with a 760.</p>
<p>admanrich i agree with u, even i find barrons really disorganised and way too difficult...</p>