Yeah, I feel like I know what you’re getting at – the original rectangle has dimensions 6/sqrt(5) and 12/sqrt(5) right? My brain also starts going to sleep around now, and I tend to make silly mistakes either before bed or during exams.
@MITer94
Just tried your question out.
Not sure if I did it right but is it D?
Work is here http://imgur dot com/DDSWsjm replace dot with .
There is probably a more elegant solution but this answer took me long enough.
@NotBadNotGood answer is correct. But no trig is required. The segment that you drew with length 1 - (1/2) sqrt(x^2 + 1) also has length x/2, so you can set the two expressions equal.
A slightly easier solution (IMO) is to let the radius of the circle be r, then you have a right triangle with legs 1, 2(1-r), and 2r (where x = 2(1-r)). The circle is tangent to CD at some point M, so the angle formed by D, M, and the center of the circle is a right angle.
When you multiply by -2 the inequalities reverse. So you get (-2)(5)>(-2)(2x+3)>(-2)(11), or equivalently -10>-4x-6>-22. Rewriting the other way, we have -22<-4x-6<-10.
Question: Let $C[x1, x2, …, x_n]$ be the ring of complex polynomials over $n$ variables. Is there always a bijective correspondence between the maximal ideals of the ring and points in n-dimensional complex space?
(Source: A slightly weaker version of HN. Got the easy direction, just wondering how to show things are in the kernel.)
Fact 1: A polynomial is divisible by 2x+3 if and only if it is divisible by x+3/2 (because 2x+3 = 2(x+3/2) ).
Fact 2 (Remainder Theorem) p(x) is divisible by x - r if and only if p® = 0.
So we plug -3/2 (or -1.5) in for x in the two functions (using our calculator).
f(-1.5) = .75 and g(-1.5) = -.25
Now just glance at the answer choices and note that .75 + 3(-.25) = 0. So the answer is B.
Notes: (1) Of course if you don’t see that B gives you 0 right away, just check each answer choice, starting with choice B or C.
(2) You can skip Fact 1 completely, and simply observe that 2x+3 = 0 when x= -3/2 = -1.5 to get the value that you need to plug in.
(3) My guess (with evidence) is that the Remainder Theorem will be very useful for the new SAT. I recommend that any student going for an 800 memorize it and practice using it.
I used another approach to solving the problem. I subbed in k+5 for x and 72 for f(x) and got the following equation 72=k^2 + 11k +30 and found that 0 = (k +14)(k-3). Therefore the positive value of k is 3. Is that an appropriate alternative approach?
@youcanleadahorse yes that solution is fine. Slightly easier IMO is to solve f(x) = 72, and since 8*9 = 72, you know that f(8) = 72, and k = 3 is a solution. (the other solution is x = -9 but it is negative).
on the actual SAT would anyone suggest doing the “free response” grid questions on both math sections first? my brain is always fried by the time i get to the end…