<p>Ok so I think I'm still confused by the concept of angular momentum and when to use it in a problem.</p>
<p>I was doing the Sparknotes practice test, and I came upon this problem:</p>
<pre><code>Questions 4445 refer to a planet of mass m orbiting a star of mass M at speed v. The orbit is circular with radius R.
</code></pre>
<ol>
<li> What would the planets velocity be if it orbited at a radius of 2R?</li>
</ol>
<p>The answers were:</p>
<p>(A) v/2
(B) v/sqrt(2)
(C) v
(D) sqrt(2)v
(E) 2v</p>
<p>I chose B and got the right answer by using the equation mv^2/R=GMm/R^2 and then solving for v. I also understand this conceptually because I know that the gravitation force between the two planets is the source of the centripetal force. However, why can't I use angular momentum to solve this problem? Namely, the equation L=mvr. According to the angular momentum equation, if radius is doubled, then velocity should be halved. Also, in what situations/type of problem should I be using angular momentum?</p>