<ol>
<li>Xiggi's SAT prep advice 436 posts 84,541 views</li>
<li>OFFICIAL October 8, 2005 SAT I Forum 1,359 67,804</li>
<li>March 12 - Official SAT 1,172 48,656 </li>
<li>Official May 6th SAT Discussion 1,157 35,615</li>
<li>OFFICIAL* January 28, 2006 SAT Thread
1,191 30,453</li>
<li>Sat Reasoning June 06 - Post All Discussions HERE!
1,079 30,073</li>
<li>Official December SAT I Forum
1,069 25,608</li>
</ol>
<p>PS In the past, posters attempted to reconcile the answers in the consolidated threads. That generated lots of attention! Hint, hint!</p>
<p>the answer to that was 75 because you know that the triangle inside the quadrilateral had that one angle of 120, so the other 2 angles added together were 60. so if you can remember the picture, you add that value to the 45 and 50 (which would amount for the 2 angles at the bottom of the quad) and then add the given angle and subtract from 360 to get x </p>
<p>the marbles question was asking for what could be the possible number of total marbles. and 14 was the correct answer with b= 3g, and g= r+1 <.. g-1 = r, cause you add them all up g +3g+g-1 = 5g -1. the answer would be 14 cause do the algebra only way you get integers for the numbers of marbles.</p>
<p>gahh..i'm going through post SAT paranoia currently!!! Like, "OMG WAS I ONE BUBBLE OFF FOR THE ENTIRE SECTION??" or "OMG DID I CHANGE THE NUMBER FOR THE GRID IN SECTION BUT FORGET TO CHANGE THE BUBBLES" or "OMG DID I DO THE ENTIRE MATH PROBLEM RIGHT BUT MAKE A STUPID MISTAKE BY FORGETTING TO MULTIPLY BY 4"</p>
<p>you don't even want to know what i'm going through. Its 48 hours hence and i'm on the verge of a semi-breakdown. Hopefully finals will take my mind off of it.</p>
<p>Ok, I've heard conflicting things about wheter the curve will be tough or not. What do you guys think? Yeah, I'm too lazy to find the answer. Sorry.</p>
<p>thanks for clearing that up jenny. I already made three stupid mistakes(put 1982, and 7/10 instead of 10/7, and didnt get the logic question ) and am worrying about makign another. My previous score is 690 and i know how to do every single problem its just that i make stupid mistakes. But, that puts me at ease because for some other marble one people were saying the answer was 6</p>
<p>the curve doesnt depend on how people do on the test. The curve is predetermined before hand. and the curve wont be tough. I am predicting average</p>
<p>does anyone know if the reading passage with the in depth vertical horizontal reading was experimental..i thought it was impossible, and i had 4 verbal so im hoping</p>
<p>i had a reading section and then two math sections back to back after that and the second one was grid in...whaat section waas experimental for me</p>
<p>I think I had the same test as you, goodcolleges. I'm hoping the second grid-in section was experimental (section 6?);)</p>
<p>kgt, I don't think that section was experimental. I only had three reading sections and I remember that passage. Do you remember the other passages? One of the others is probably experimental if you had four of them.</p>
<p>no, horizontal vs. vertical info passage was NOT experimental. I had math exper. and that was on mine. Also, the japanese artist, morse code, pathogens, confused explorer, mars, and comedy were NOT equating.</p>
<p>what's this other test version thats dominating this thread now?</p>
<p>wait, digamma....i had the same test as you.....but i did not have a section on morse code or pathogens. i had a CR expiremental. - had japanese artist, explorer, comedy, mars, and disney land, and another short passage about how a man appears to people.</p>
<p>i believed that the disney land section was expiremental since no other people i knew had that.</p>