SAT test 26.01.13

Test Preparation
281

<p>@tomatox1</p>

<p>I put the tone as optimistic, and for the 3rd question I put the answer with “displayed”</p>

282

<p>@tomato</p>

<ol>
<li>Optimistic</li>
<li>I don’t remember, but it was definitely not a “No error.” I think. Not sure. Lewl. Dun remember.</li>
<li>displayed</li>
</ol>

283

<p>@thelemonisinplay I agree with all of those responses.</p>

284

<p>there was one question that asked about the birds around the bird watchers home</p>

<p>One of the answers was</p>

<p>Dearth/ Diminution</p>

<p>anyone remember that?</p>

285

<p>@RhythmMelon Idk, maybe the SAT was trying to trip us up because on the ratio ones, you usually have to add stuff to the denominator. But maybe this time they did it this way purposely. That seems kind of bogus, though. But it doesn’t matter to me, because 6 works both ways.</p>

286

<p>Does anyone remember the question/answer on the architecture passage where one of the choices said that people make assumptions based on their surroundings?</p>

287

<ol>
<li>Dang it! I put “which at the time only exists in theory” or something similar, because it was talkign about 1936 and should be "which at the time only existed in theory</li>
</ol>

288

<p>@tomatox1 1. i put optimistic, i don’t recall the other two questions your mentioned</p>

289

<p>@SamLHS Yup, I put that too. Any others you remember?</p>

290

<p>What was the answer to the writing question where some Pakistani studied ancient Indian art. One of the answer choices was reinterpret</p>

291

<p>@Sam LHS im pretty sure Dearth/diminution is right for that question</p>

292

<p>Just saying, it’s a lot better to make a chatroom because then we wouldn’t be caught</p>

293

<p>Does anyone remember the questions with Megalomania / Paranoia?</p>

294

<p>oh man, for the bird one i put jumble and stability</p>

295

<p>@koolkatkoolkat i put paranoia!</p>

296

<p>paranoia, megalomania means having unrealistic dreams of grandeur.</p>

297

<p>What about the writing question on the last section that went</p>

<p>blah… was known for both…</p>

<p>or was it blah… was known both for…</p>

298

<p>@piquantpeppers
i think for that question i put no error
im not entirely sure though because i had a hard time answering that one</p>

299

<p>Does anyone remember the identifying errors question: That there (exist) an infinite number of worlds (were)…blah blah?</p>

300

<p>@piquantpeppers it was “was known for both”</p>