<p>What did you guys say about the condition when blood calcium was low, did the body engage in calcium-rising activities or PTH just decreased?</p>
<p>plants use hormones like auxins</p>
<p>i said calcium rising</p>
<p>Yeah, me too. What about the last question in M... did the bacteria level get back to normal ?</p>
<p>What was the question...
I remeber it was 10 times as much (I hope.. i had 1 min to do the last experment quesitons... i think that if i remember rgiht, some bacteria had a resistance to the anti biotic before it was placed in</p>
<p>It was like: after day 6 or 7, dont really remember, what happened to the patient...or to the bacterial level... im not sure.. i said it just got back to normal cause the bacterial level was fluctuating you know and the cure ended in 12 days it was written in the description..anyway</p>
<p>yeah, it was 10 times as much
but I dont really remember the resistance thing
how was the exact question?</p>
<p>i took sparknotes tests the day before and they highest i coiuld get was a 690, but for some reason it feels like this time i did a lot better. does anyone know wat a raw score of about a 62 would get you</p>
<p>62 is pretty bad</p>
<p>714nD1... don't take my word since i rushed through the M section.. but I believe that some of the bacteria already had a mutation that helped them be penicillian resistannt, and thats why the lvls rose again.. correct me if im not thinking of the right question</p>
<p>62=710... how is that bad lol</p>
<p>Actually, I can't remember any question asking why the bacterial level rose again?</p>
<p>How was it exactly, to the nearest proximity you can recall(question nor answer please)</p>
<p>Well mate it all depends on the curve but a raw score of 62 would equate to</p>
<p>680(according to PR)
710(according to Kaplan)</p>
<p>Hope Kaplan rules! :D</p>
<p>A) 62=710 in real SAT book provided by college board</p>
<p>b) for that last question... i think it asked about why the lvl of bacteria grew from 4-12... or something like that</p>
<p>it was lowest at 4 (queston 98)
10 times more (quetsion 99)
I really am not sure though.. </p>
<p>And if anyone else remembers the last question plz speak up (on M)</p>
<p>i dunno but i remember my scantron for the last question i put D and for 99,98,97 i put C haha</p>
<p>and on the top of the M section i had like zig zag liek answers</p>
<p>nah the question was. when did it observe the largest decrease in bacteria. on day 4 there was an increase of bacteria. it was day 2</p>
<p>@NJ:ahhh memory is recovering somehow i guess,:P
so 98&99 i got exact same answers as you
and i think the 100th question was what happened to the level of bacteria/why did it slightly increase and then fluctuate from day 4 to 12...</p>
<p>I chose, because the bacterial level got back to normal. I tooke that 12-day cure for granted, so the cure lasted 12, then by day 12 the patient should be oK
as far as i know antibiotics kill a lot of bacteria, and later the bacterial level gets back to a normal acceptable level.
where were this bacteria located by the way, what type of bacteria were they?</p>
<p>does anyone remember the answers to the photosynthesis Isotope questions?</p>
<p>i think i remeber marking that glucose is made regardless of da isotope or something</p>
<p>so... if im not wrong
one was asking::
what is the conclusion from EXP I</p>
<p>TonyxWang.... are you sure about that??</p>
<p>I thought it said on which day was the number of bacteria at the lowest... anyone else wanna confirm who is right?</p>
<p>It said : on which day the highest decrease in bacterial levels is observed</p>