<p>Can anyone with a 700 or above give some advice for studying for the SATII MATH Level 2c. Some online resources will be helpful. </p>
<p>Thank you</p>
<p>Can anyone with a 700 or above give some advice for studying for the SATII MATH Level 2c. Some online resources will be helpful. </p>
<p>Thank you</p>
<p>I took it on the 4th, and hopefully I got 700+. If you've taken pre-calc, you should be fine. It's important to familiarize yourself with your calculator. Once you learn to utilize all the features of your calc, it will become SO powerful.</p>
<p>So how did u study?? I am ready to work for that score</p>
<p>I went through all of the princeton review book and got a 720. It goes through all the important topics throughly but some of the flashcards they have at the end of each chapter is overkilll for the test. But if u go through the whole book and memorize all their flashcards im sure ull do fine.</p>
<p>I also took 2C on Saturday and I expect about 750.
I'd advise you to review statistics - just the basic stuff: median, mode, range, average and weighted average, standard deviation.
If you don't have a graphing calculartor reviewing the behavior of trig functions: amplitude, period, phase shift is a good idea.</p>
<p>Have a look at the Kaplan Book - it provides a good deal of realistic questions and two practice tests. </p>
<p>And if you have the Barron's textbook - don't stress yourself too much - the test was much easier than what is offered in that book.</p>
<p>victor- i think the kaplan tests was far easier than the real test. I agree that the barrons practice tests are just too hard compared to the real thing. </p>
<p>btw, i got a 790. i lost out on a 800 because my education syllabus does not place much emphasis on functions, leave alone graphs of functions! we are not allowed use calculators n stuff like that.
To prep 4 da test, i bought a graphing calc and fiddled around with it till i got a hang of it. I tried to learn how to utilize my calc to the max... n i guess it worked! if u use a prog graphing calc., be sure to have progz like triangle solvers ( Combines all trigono rules-sin rule, cosine rule,etc), coordinate geo., etc. they r very helpful for the test.</p>
<p>I have an 800 and I self-studied using the Real SATII practice tests. </p>
<p>To do well you must fully understand trig, can't stress this enough. Learn trig! Know ratios and don't suck at algebra/arithmetic. Know how to use the ( and ) keys in your calculator. Understand the nature of probability. Be able to understand equations as they relate to graphs. If you can do that you're good to go.</p>
<p>rm1987, indeed, the first of the two Kaplan tests was easier than the real thing.
Test B though was at the same level as the real test.</p>
<p>By the way how do you know your scores or you just estimate them?</p>
<p>this is my oct test score. in dec i tried my luck with IC because the percentile for a 790 seems very low for IIC. Also, IC almost has no qs dealing with relating graphs n functions.</p>
<p>what's the deal with these percentiles, i mean isn't 790 a decent score?</p>
<p>seems decent.. but the PR for a 790 is 86<i think=""> => around 14% of all IIC test-takers have a 800! for me as intl app to the ivies, i guess the SAT IIs are more imp than the SAT I score < thats atleast what most of the ppl arnd here say></i></p><i think="">
</i>