Above all else, I appreciate your time here, same with lookingforward.
“I wanted to pipe in and suggest you try and embrace the themes @lookingforward to is suggesting.”
The issue here is that, in order to embrace these themes, I would have to have to completely change my lifestyle and my families lifestyle. It isn’t an option at this point, but it could be in the future. I’ve been working with what I got, but that, unfortunately, means that it contradicts some of lookingforward’s suggestions.
“As I have said previously you have a strong voice but your written tone comes off as argumentative.”
I am trying to have an argumentative tone because I was arguing my case for personal context. I am using this tone because, when she compared me to other applicants’ personal context, I strongly disagreed with her. That isn’t to say that she is wrong, but she simply doesn’t understand my story, so I wanted to provide some insight by showing how I demonstrated a lot of the stuff she listed.
They key point here is that I’m not sitting here denying all the advice and going on my own path. What I am doing is saying I can’t follow that advice and I’m trying to find angles that can support me best in the situation I am in. When I try to find those angles, I’m met with the understandable response of something along the lines of “that is far worse, you’re doing it wrong.” The thing is, I can’t exactly do all of this advice, so why not try and figure out what I can do and have done.
Also, to clarify, I did not try and argue a diversity claim with my workload. I was saying that it might help that I’m from an extremely rural part of northern Canada.
@lookingforward
That’s totally understandable and I respect your commitment. I come to this forum only for advice and reality checks. I can assure you that I’m taking everything into consideration, but your advice seems to not apply to me. You said how, in order to have a personal context angle, I have to exhibit (show) x, y, and z qualities. I responded and showed how I exhibit these qualities. In order for me to take advice, I have to understand it and think it applies to me. In this context, I either don’t understand it or genuinely don’t think your advice applies to me-- this is why I commented. This isn’t a fault of yours, but rather mine because I haven’t told my story properly.
I have to say, and I’ve reread this multiple times now, I don’t quite understand how I misread you. I was directly quoting you throughout the text and didn’t take anything out of context, as far as I know.
I have nothing but respect for you and your advice. I’m not trying to sound ungrateful or anything like that, because I truly am grateful. I took your advice and responded with how I (think I) already met a lot of that advice.
@Nocreativity1 @lookingforward
I think this can all be summarized with one response to one quote. “The tippy tops want the standard, time-proven basics.” I can’t be that. I already have that six years of high school, online student, lack of ECs, and no APs in grade 10s on my application. I already lived at my lake for years. I already did my tests and my classes. I can’t change this stuff, but I still want to apply to top schools with the extremely small bit of hope that I can get into one of the top schools. If not, I’m living a great life here in Canada and I will study at a great university here.
I genuinely can’t understand the purpose of your ‘advice,’ and I am sorry for that. It’s not helping me to improve my application because I legitimately can’t take most of your advice, and the purpose seems to be to make me realize that I am not a strong applicant at top schools and don’t really have a shot-- which I already understand and am taking into consideration with my application.