<p>mtandbassmom.</p>
<p>My son is a popular music performance major at USC. I’m not that familiar with other programs but feel somewhat qualified to respond to some of the other comments about pursuing a popular music performance degree because we considered some of the issues other posters have raised.</p>
<p>First remember that most music schools didn’t institute jazz programs until jazz popularity was in decline. USC is a little out front, but I suspect a popular music definition would encompass jazz if that were the popular form at the time. The idea of a popular music degree is to advance the music knowledge of talented musicians who are interested in a popular music career, not one in classical or jazz. It is obviously not required because many people who are popular musicians have not pursued music degrees or maybe even pursued classical or jazz degrees. The million dollar question is will having the curriculum at USC help aspiring popular musicians more than say touring or other forms of development.</p>
<p>The popular music program at USC has a core of basic music training at least a little similar to classical or jazz. Aural skills and music theory, instrument instruction in both the students primary instrument as well as at least one other and probably two since everyone takes drumming and I think piano to ground them in the rhythm of popular music. Songwriting class is taken by most although I don’t remember if it is required or not. Most students also take private lessons in their instrument. There is also a performance class every week where you are assigned songs to perform with an assigned set of band members. Instructors for this class are often working musicians. Every Friday afternoon someone from the music industry comes to the Popular Music Forum class and provides insight into popular music as a career. Performers like John Fogarty, agents, record company execs, members of “late-night tv bands”, you name it. The few times we have visited usually includes a Friday and we enjoy this exposure very much. </p>
<p>Primary advantages to the program are the quality of the instruction, the quality of the other popular music students who you collaborate with and develop your artistic self with, the contacts and exposure to industry personnel and the exposure to the film school and other USC arts students some of whom are exceptional at their craft. My son’s exposure to exceptional musicians and industry people, famous and not has been exceptional. Some of this has been and is 1-1. Also I would be remiss if I did not state that the person in charge of the program is an exceptionally wonderful human who I find to have great integrity.</p>
<p>I will admit that for the first year or so, I still questioned if this was a smart thing for us to be funding. USC is not an inexpensive school and son is smart kid who could do a lot of things. At this point the quality of the experiences he is having and how he feels about his program and his passion for music have me convinced that for him it is the right choice. He has formed a band of very talented people. He will make a living as a musician although it may or many not be with this band. May or may not be a lot of money, but he will be happy and he will be good at it. </p>
<p>I am not an artistic type and more of an analytical, so if you are considering this program I would suggest the following logic. </p>
<p>If a student wants to play rock music but isn’t really interested in a broader music education I would not recommend it. Someone like this may be better served forming a band wherever they are or want to be and performing a lot to develop their skills.</p>
<p>If a student has a great voice but isn’t really interested in a broader music education I would not recommend it. There are a lot of great voices in the world. USC has great vocal instruction, but if that is all you want you can get exceptional vocal instruction in LA or other big cities a lot cheaper than USC tuition. If someone wants to rely on voice alone, maybe should try idol, record youtube covers, etc. because you need to end up at the top of that heap if you are going to rely primarily on your voice.</p>
<p>If a student wants to develop a deeper music understanding and have top instruction with a popular music bend then I think USC does that better than anyone.</p>
<p>From an electric bass specific perspective, my son lives with and is friends with the bass player in his band who last I knew was majoring in electric bass and stand-up and in both the popular music and jazz programs and speaks very highly of his instructors. He wanted to do both programs, but most electric bass players in the program do not. </p>
<p>The audition process is very competitive but my view is I think people should apply and see. No sense ruling yourself out, let them be the ones to do it.</p>
<p>The other posters raise valid perspectives and I am not intending to argue with those perspectives. I just wanted to provide a little perspective from someone with experience in the program.</p>
<p>Best Wishes</p>